Cards (15)

  • One criticism of cognitive distortions as an explanation of involvement in offending behaviour
    They are more useful in describing the thought processes that criminals go through after committing a crime
  • Minimisation accurately describes how a person might deal with their guilt
    But it doesn't explain how they got there in the first place
  • It is questionable how useful cognitive distortions are in explaining offending behaviour
  • Psychodynamic explanations

    Proposed that long-term separations between mother and child could have a long-term emotional consequences, one of which is affectionless psychopathy
  • Heller et al's work with young men from disadvantaged groups in Chicago

    1. Used cognitive behavioural techniques to reduce judgement and decision-making errors
    2. Participants who attended 13 one-hour sessions had a 44% reduction in arrests compared to the control group
  • CBT can be effective in helping rehabilitate people
  • Kohlberg developed his theory using an all-male sample and assumed that it would apply to women, which is a beta bias
  • When women were tested, they appeared to be less morally developed than men, who are significantly more likely to be offenders
  • Gilligan argued that the whole cognitive explanation is gender biassed, focusing on male ideas of justice and not female ideas of care
  • It is inappropriate to use Kohlberg's theory in a society attempting to establish gender equality
  • Offenders showed less mature moral reasoning than a non-offending control group
    This suggests that role playing opportunities should be provided in order to develop moral reasoning
  • Individuals who committed crimes for financial gain
    Were more likely to show pre-conventional moral reasoning than those convicted of impulsive crime with no level of reasoning
  • Pre-conventional morality tends to be associated with crimes in which offenders believe they have a good chance of avoiding punishment
  • Intelligence may be a better predictor of criminality than moral reasoning
  • This would explain why people with low intelligence are less likely to commit crime despite having low levels of moral reasoning