Save
Forensics
Psychological Explanations - AO3
Cognitive
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
chloe
Visit profile
Cards (15)
One criticism of cognitive distortions as an explanation of involvement in offending behaviour
They are more useful in describing the
thought
processes that criminals go through after committing a
crime
View source
Minimisation accurately describes how a person might deal with their
guilt
But it doesn't explain how they got there in the
first
place
View source
It is questionable how useful
cognitive distortions
are in explaining offending behaviour
View source
Psychodynamic
explanations
Proposed that
long-term
separations between mother and child could have a long-term emotional consequences, one of which is
affectionless
psychopathy
View source
Heller
et al's work with young men from disadvantaged groups in Chicago
1. Used
cognitive behavioural
techniques to reduce judgement and decision-making errors
2. Participants who attended 13 one-hour sessions had a
44
% reduction in arrests compared to the control group
View source
CBT can be effective in helping
rehabilitate
people
View source
Kohlberg developed his theory using an all-male sample and assumed that it would apply to
women
, which is a
beta
bias
View source
When women were tested, they appeared to be
less morally developed
than men, who are significantly more likely to be
offenders
View source
Gilligan
argued that the whole cognitive explanation is
gender biassed
, focusing on male ideas of justice and not female ideas of care
View source
It is inappropriate to use
Kohlberg's
theory in a society attempting to establish
gender equality
View source
Offenders showed less
mature moral reasoning
than a non-offending
control group
This suggests that
role playing opportunities
should be provided in order to develop
moral reasoning
View source
Individuals who committed crimes for financial gain
Were more likely to show
pre-conventional
moral reasoning than those convicted of impulsive crime with no level of
reasoning
View source
Pre-conventional
morality tends to be associated with crimes in which offenders believe they have a good chance of avoiding
punishment
View source
Intelligence may be a better predictor of criminality than
moral reasoning
View source
This would explain why people with
low intelligence
are less likely to commit crime despite having low levels of
moral reasoning
View source