capacity, duration and coding of the STM & LTM

Cards (30)

  • Cognitive psychology

    Interested in trying to explain how memory works
  • Compute metaphor
    We try to understand the mind by comparing it to a computer
  • Short-term memory (STM)

    • Stores the information we are currently aware of
    • Temporary store where small amounts of information can be kept for brief periods
  • Processing new information to store from sensory input
    1. Take in information from the senses and transform it into a memory trace
    2. Information is encoded (e.g. acoustically if learned through sound)
  • If we do not rehearse information

    It is forgotten
  • Capacity of STM
    Limited and can remember 5-9 items on average
  • Duration of STM
    18-30 seconds
  • Jacobs' digit span test (1887)

    1. Researcher gives a number of digits and participants have to recall them all in order
    2. Researcher increases the amount by 1 digit and participant has to recall again until they recall the correct order
  • Jacobs found that on average participants remembered 9.3 digits and 7.3 letters
  • Miller (1957) replicated Jacobs' study and found people can recall 7 (+ or -2) items from STM
  • Chunking
    We can group information together to increase the capacity of STM
  • STM
    • Limited capacity - only about 7 items can be stored at a time
    • Limited duration - storage is very fragile and information can be lost with distraction or passing of time
  • Peterson & Peterson (1959) study
    1. 24 participants recalling trigrams after 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds
    2. Participants counted backwards in 3s or 4s to prevent rehearsal
  • The longer the time between trigrams being presented and recall, the less that was remembered
  • Strengths of Peterson & Peterson study
    • Supports the multi-store model
    • High internal validity - standardised procedure with high control
  • Limitations of Peterson & Peterson study
    • Sample bias - only 24 students used
    • Lacks ecological validity - artificial environment, not representative of everyday situation
  • Baddeley (1966) study

    1. 72 participants placed in conditions with acoustically similar/different or semantically similar/different words
    2. Participants had to recall the words
  • In STM, there is better recall of acoustically different than acoustically similar words
  • Strengths of Baddeley study
    • Standardised and easily replicated, high reliability
  • Limitations of Baddeley study
    • Sample bias - 72 participants not representative
    • Low ecological validity - lab study, not generalisable to everyday life
  • Long-term memory (LTM)
    • Permanent memory store
    • Information in STM can be transferred to LTM if attended to long enough
    • Coding in LTM is semantic - information holds meaning
    • Capacity is potentially unlimited and can hold information for years
    • Duration is potentially a lifetime
  • Bahrick (1975) study

    1. 400 participants aged 17-74 asked to remember names and recognise photos of ex-classmates
    2. Tested at different time intervals after graduation
  • Participants were 90% accurate in identifying names and faces within 15 years of graduation, but this dropped to 80% verbally and 70% visually after 48 years
  • Participants were better at photo recognition than free recall, with 60% accuracy after 15 years and 30% after 48 years
  • Strengths of Bahrick study
    • High external validity - used meaningful stimuli
  • Limitations of Bahrick study

    • Did not control for confounding variables as memories may have been rehearsed over the years
  • human memory is the process by which we retain information about events that have happened in the past
  • coding is the format in which the information is stored in the memory
  • capacity is the amount of information held in a memory store
  • duration is the length of time information can be held in the memory