capacity, duration and coding of the STM & LTM

    Cards (30)

    • Cognitive psychology

      Interested in trying to explain how memory works
    • Compute metaphor
      We try to understand the mind by comparing it to a computer
    • Short-term memory (STM)

      • Stores the information we are currently aware of
      • Temporary store where small amounts of information can be kept for brief periods
    • Processing new information to store from sensory input
      1. Take in information from the senses and transform it into a memory trace
      2. Information is encoded (e.g. acoustically if learned through sound)
    • If we do not rehearse information

      It is forgotten
    • Capacity of STM
      Limited and can remember 5-9 items on average
    • Duration of STM
      18-30 seconds
    • Jacobs' digit span test (1887)

      1. Researcher gives a number of digits and participants have to recall them all in order
      2. Researcher increases the amount by 1 digit and participant has to recall again until they recall the correct order
    • Jacobs found that on average participants remembered 9.3 digits and 7.3 letters
    • Miller (1957) replicated Jacobs' study and found people can recall 7 (+ or -2) items from STM
    • Chunking
      We can group information together to increase the capacity of STM
    • STM
      • Limited capacity - only about 7 items can be stored at a time
      • Limited duration - storage is very fragile and information can be lost with distraction or passing of time
    • Peterson & Peterson (1959) study
      1. 24 participants recalling trigrams after 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18 seconds
      2. Participants counted backwards in 3s or 4s to prevent rehearsal
    • The longer the time between trigrams being presented and recall, the less that was remembered
    • Strengths of Peterson & Peterson study
      • Supports the multi-store model
      • High internal validity - standardised procedure with high control
    • Limitations of Peterson & Peterson study
      • Sample bias - only 24 students used
      • Lacks ecological validity - artificial environment, not representative of everyday situation
    • Baddeley (1966) study

      1. 72 participants placed in conditions with acoustically similar/different or semantically similar/different words
      2. Participants had to recall the words
    • In STM, there is better recall of acoustically different than acoustically similar words
    • Strengths of Baddeley study
      • Standardised and easily replicated, high reliability
    • Limitations of Baddeley study
      • Sample bias - 72 participants not representative
      • Low ecological validity - lab study, not generalisable to everyday life
    • Long-term memory (LTM)
      • Permanent memory store
      • Information in STM can be transferred to LTM if attended to long enough
      • Coding in LTM is semantic - information holds meaning
      • Capacity is potentially unlimited and can hold information for years
      • Duration is potentially a lifetime
    • Bahrick (1975) study

      1. 400 participants aged 17-74 asked to remember names and recognise photos of ex-classmates
      2. Tested at different time intervals after graduation
    • Participants were 90% accurate in identifying names and faces within 15 years of graduation, but this dropped to 80% verbally and 70% visually after 48 years
    • Participants were better at photo recognition than free recall, with 60% accuracy after 15 years and 30% after 48 years
    • Strengths of Bahrick study
      • High external validity - used meaningful stimuli
    • Limitations of Bahrick study

      • Did not control for confounding variables as memories may have been rehearsed over the years
    • human memory is the process by which we retain information about events that have happened in the past
    • coding is the format in which the information is stored in the memory
    • capacity is the amount of information held in a memory store
    • duration is the length of time information can be held in the memory