Psychological explanations: Cognitive Level

    Cards (14)

    • Moral development

      Kohlberg's concept of moral reasoning applied to offending behaviour
    • Kohlberg's theory of moral reasoning
      1. Proposed that people's decisions + judgements on issues of right + wrong can be summarised in stage theory
      2. Higher the stage, more sophisticated the reasoning
      3. Based on people's responses to moral dilemmas, e.g. Heinz dilemma
    • Offenders
      Tend to show a lower level of moral reasoning than non-offenders
    • Violent youths
      Were at a lower level of moral development than non-violent youths, even after controlling for social background
    • Preconventional level of Kohlberg's model
      Characterised by need to avoid punishment + gain rewards, + is associated w/ less mature, childlike reasoning
    • Adults + adolescents who reason at preconventional level

      May commit crime if they can get away with it and gain rewards
    • Offenders
      Often more egocentric + display poorer social perspective-taking skills than non-offender peers
    • Individuals who reason at higher levels

      Tend to sympathise more w/ the rights of others + exhibit more conventional behaviours such as honesty, generosity + non-violence
    • Cognitive distortions
      Errors/ biases in people's information processing system characterised by faulty thinking
    • Hostile attribution bias
      Propensity for violence is often associated w/ a tendency to misinterpret the actions of other people as confrontational when they aren't
    • Violent offenders
      Were significantly more likely to perceive ambiguous facial expressions as angry + hostile compared to non-aggressive control group
    • Aggressive + rejected children

      Interpreted ambiguous provocation as more hostile than non-aggressive + accepted children
    • Minimalisation
      Attempt to deny/ downplay the seriousness of an offence, e.g. burglars saying they're supporting their family
    • Individuals who commit sexual offences
      Are prone to minimalisation, with 54% denying they had committed an offence at all and 40% minimising the harm caused to the victim
    See similar decks