behaviourist explanation in relation to psych as a science
is scientific as it is based on established theories with empirical evidence
behaviourist explanation in relation to reductionism/holism
reductionist in the way it does not take into account possible biological explanations
however it does combine three learning mechanisms so not entirely reductionist
behaviourist explanation in relation to freewill/determinism
deterministic in terms of people not being able to change their past experiences
although the treatments suggest we can change our behaviours and so freewill
behaviourist explanation in relation to nature/nurture
nurture- environmental experiences shape our phobias, could be traumatic experiences, reinforcers, or exposer to role models
cognitive explanation in relation to psych as a science
difficult to test in an objective way as often relies on self-report of patients' beliefs
evidence of cognitive based on therapies being effective can be seen as supporting the explanation as being testable and scientific
cognitive explanation in relation to reductionism/holism
generally ignores some biological explanations
it does though accept that a combination of learning through past experiences and traumatic events may combine to create irrational thoughts/negative thinking
cognitive explanation in relation to freewill/determinism
deterministic as our negative thoughts determine how we react to stressors
but through therapy this can change and so we perhaps freewill
cognitive explanation in relation to nature/nurture
bit of mixture of nature and nurture
our environment causes stressors that we respond to
Beck accepts some people biologically are more likely not to cope with them and so perhaps develop schizophrenia/depression
psychodynamic explanation in relation to psych as a science
least scientific of all as we cannot measure unconscious conflicts in the mind and subjective interpretation of dreams/anxieties is needed by the therapist
lacks precise data on what would cause a fixation at a psychosexual stage, what is too much breastfeeding?
psychodynamic explanation in relation to reduction/holism
reductionist in ignoring behavioural and biological explanations
although within the theory itself a wide range of explanations exist
psychodynamic explanation in relation to freewill/determinism
internal conflicts determine our behaviours and these problems in our mind developed as a result of our experiences as a child
the freewill aspect is in accepting and bringing out these experiences to help rebalance our mind
psychodynamic explanation in relation to nature/nurture
nature in terms of we all apparently have an Id, ego and superego and go through the same stages of psychosexual development
however nurture, such as our childhood environment/ experiences shapes how our mind develops
applications in relation to ethical considerations
RET- can be quite 'harsh' blunt therapy in terms of making people accept/challenge their irrational beliefs and so potentially distressing parts
flooding is very unethical, participants are harmed and right to withdrawal is not maintained
applications in relation to usefulness
systematic desensitisation- very effective for specific phobias, relatively quick and quite cheap. less useful for more social/complex phobias
flooding- not used any more, too harmful
aversion therapy- need person to take the drug, only useful for drug addictions
RET- tales a number of sessions to improve, and a well-motivated individual, not really useful with children or specific phobias