Save
Psychology
Social Influence
Conformity
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
eve
Visit profile
Subdecks (2)
Explanations
Psychology > Social Influence > Conformity
7 cards
Types
Psychology > Social Influence > Conformity
4 cards
Cards (32)
Conformity
a change in a persons behaviour or
opinions
as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people (
social environment
)
Types of Conformity
identification
compliance
internalisation
Compliance
going along with others in public
private beliefs do not change
results in a
superficial
change
behaviour stops when group
pressure
is gone
Internalisation
occurs when a person genuinely
agrees
with the groups
norms
private
beliefs change as well as
public
beliefs/behaviour
permanent
change as beliefs have been
internalised
Identification
conforming
because there is something that we value about a
group
private beliefs
may not change but can
Deutsch and Gerard (1955) - Explanations for conformity
two-process
theory
normative social influence
(NSI)
informational social influence
(ISI)
Normative social influence
(NSI)
what are the
'norms'
/ typical behaviour of a group
emotional
instead of
cognitive
usually leads to
compliance
Informational social influence
(ISI)
who has the better
information
?
cognitive
process - what do we
think
?
most likely to happen when in
new
situations - we don't know what is right -
ambiguity
leads to
internalisation
-
permanent
change
Strength of NSI
evidence to support it as an explanation of
conformity
Asch
- people wanted to
agree
with the group even if they personally knew the answer
Limitations of NSI
Individual differences
some people are greatly concerned with being
liked
by others (
nAffiliators
)
Strengths of ISI
Research support
for ISI as an explanation for conformity
Lucas
et al. -
hard maths questions
, people conformed more than when questions were easy
Limitations of ISI
some situations are unclear as to whether it is
NSI
or
ISI
Asch
(1951)
aim
- assess to what extent people will
conform to the opinion of others
baseline
- later studies are
compared
to this one
Asch
- procedure
123
American men
in groups of
8
1
naive participant,
7
confederates
asked to compare
lines
Asch
(1955) -
Variables
affecting conformity
group
size
task
difficulty
unanimity
Group size
curvilinear
relationship between group size and conformity
tested groups of
2-16
conformity rates increases up to
3
people and then it levels off
Unanimity
when there is the presence of a
non-conforming
confederate
when there was a
non-conforming
confed. conformity rates decreased - felt free to give
opinion
Task
difficulty
made the lines more similar in
size
conformity
increased
ISI
- people conformed as they didnt
trust
their own mind
Asch's Baseline Findings
participants conformed to incorrect confeds. on average
36.8
% of the time
individual differences
-
25
% never conformed
Limitations of Asch's study
artificial
task - the task lacked
mundane realism
- cannot generalise to the real world
Limited application due to
population validity
- all
male
participants
Individual factors e.g.
confidence
affects conformity - shown in Lucas et al. (2006) - people who were confident in
maths
were less likely to conform
Strengths of Asch's Baseline study
support
from other studies
See all 32 cards