Milgram designed a baseline procedure that could be used to assess obedience levels.
Procedure
In Milgram's study, 40 American men volunteered for a memory study. An authority figure, also a confederate, ordered the participant to give fakeelectric shocks to a learner in another room.
findings
All participants in Milgram's study gave shocks up to 300 volts. Some stopped at 300 volts, but others went up to 450 volts, showing full obedience. One participant felt extreme tension, and three even had uncontrollable seizures.
Research support
In a French documentary about reality TV, participants gave (fake) electric shocks in a game show setup. 80% delivered the maximum shock of 460 volts, similar to Milgram's study, supporting his findings on obedience to authority.
Low internal validity
Orne and Holland argued that participants in Milgram's study were 'play-acting' and didn't believe in the setup. Perry's research indicates demandcharacteristics influenced their behavior.
Counterpoint
In Sheridan and King's study, participants gave real shocks to a puppy. Despite the distress, many obeyed orders, indicating genuine obedience similar to Milgram's findings.
Ethical issues
Participants were deceived about roles and real shocks. Milgram debriefed them, but deception in studies can harm both participants and researchers.