Explanations of behaviours such as obedience emphasise them being caused by an individual's own personalcharacteristics rather than situational influences within the environment
Also known as the 'California F scale' or the 'Fascismscale, the F scale was developed in California in 1947 by Ardono as a measure of authoritariantraits or tendencies
A cluster of personality variables (conventionalism, authority submission and authoritarian aggression) that are associated with a 'right-wing' attitude to life
Resulted from harsh parenting in childhood featuring strict discipline, an expectation of absolute loyalty, impossibly high standards and severe criticism of perceived failings
Elms and Milgram also found that obedient participants were less close to their fathers during childhood and admired the experimenter, which was the opposite for disobedient participants
Investigate if there is a relationship between a person’s personalitytype and prejudice beliefs.
Procedure
Adorno et al. studied 2000+ middle-class, white Americans to understand obedient personality traits and racial attitudes. They created the F-scale to measure authoritarian traits.
Findings
The study showed that authoritarian individuals admired 'strong' people, looked down on the 'weak', were status-conscious, and had clear stereotypes about different groups, linking authoritarianism with prejudice.
Research support
Milgram and Elms found that obedient participants scored higher on the F-scale than disobedient ones, supporting the link between obedience and traits of the Authoritarian Personality, as proposed by Adorno et al.
Counterpoint
Obedient participants differed from authoritarians in many ways, suggesting that authoritarianism is not a reliable predictor of obedience.
Limited explanation
Authoritarianism can't explain widespread obedience, like in pre-war Germany where millions displayed anti-Semitic behavior. Social identity theory suggests people identified with the Nazi state, challenging Adorno's theory.
Flawed evidence
The F-scale is criticised by Greenstein for methodological errors, leading to inaccurate assessments due to the possibility of obtaining high scores by selecting "agree" answers.