the fundamental socialinstitutions and their arrangement into one scheme
Rawls believes that socialjustice concerns the basic structure of society, not transactions between individuals
Declining Marginal Utility of Money
any additional money to someone's income produces less, happiness or welfare, than earlier additions did
Distributive Justice
the proper distribution of social benefits and burdens (in particular economic benefits and burdens)
Free Market
unregulated market transactions
Property Rights
what you have legitimately acquired is yours to do with as you will
State of Nature
the existence of people without an overseeing authority
Worker Participation
Mill advocated for breaking down the divide between producers and capitalists, arguing that this would enhance productivity and promote the well-being of people involved.
He believed that partnership, either between laborers and capitalists or among themselves, would eventually replace the traditional master-work relationship.
Justice - Fairness
concerns the fair treatment of members of groups of people or fair compensation of prior injuries
Justice - Equality
justice requires that our treatment of people reflect their fundamental moral equality
however, we all believe that some differences in the treatment of people, is consistent with equality (ex: capital punishment)
Justice - Desert
justice requires that people get what they deserve
Justice - Rights
one is treated unjustly when one's moral rights are violated
JS Mill made this the defining characteristic of injustice
he believes that what distinguishes injustice from other types of wrongful behaviour is that it involves violating the rights of a person
Aristotle'sFormal Principle of Justice
similar cases must be treated alike except when there are relevant differences
this principle emphasizes the role of impartiality and consistency in justice
however it's a purely formal principle because it doesn't clearly state which differences are relevant and which are not
Rawls Natural Lottery Argument
Distributive shares should NOT be allotted on the basis of morally arbitrarycontingencies
justice is not to be understood in terms of moral desert but rather a matter of correcting the socialconsequences of morally arbitrary naturaldifferences
Meritorious system
People ought to get what they deserve
Talents that we think are deserving of a reward
A matter of luck
Whether society values the talent
A matter of luck
Whether we were raised in an environment that motivates us to work hard and develop our talents