Later years

Cards (17)

  • Elizabeth hoped that the definition of the royal prerogative would end attempts to undermine it. 1588 - MPs unhappy about her privileges, less willing to accept purveyance and monopolies
  • 1593= the commons asked to fix the issue of purveyance but Cecil said it infringed the royal prerogative.
  • Parliament was summoned 4 times after 1588 as she needed money. Later parliaments were less willing to grant it
  • Impact of the Spanish Armada
    • showed the power of England
    • caused financial problems
    • invasion scares in the 1590s
    • 1599 - forced to sell crown lands and reduce court expenditure
  • Elizabeth had no clear policy after the Spanish Armada
  • Bad harvests in the 1580s and 90s= the price of bread doubled, death rate due to malnutrition increased by 50%
  • 1597 and 1601 - unrest about monopolies
  • Oxfordshire protests in 1596
    • govt became paranoid about unrest
    • protest due to enclosure - not a large threat, but the govt responded harshly
    • controlled unrest, govt thought it was bigger threat
  • Irish Rebellion 1598
    • most serious unrest
    • fear that the Irish would allow Spanish troops to form a base - attracted lots of support
    • Essex was unable to deal with it so replaced by Mountjoy
    • ended in 1603
  • Essex Rebellion 1601
    • failed in the irish rebellion damaging his reputation
    • had support in Court and London, but his defiance reduced support and his monopoly for sweet wines was removed so he had less income
    • attempted to raise a rebellion but not supported
    • crushed easily - viewed as nuisance
  • Elizabeth faced opposition due to the 1590s economic crisis
  • The attendance of her court declined and she made less presences
  • Her looks diminished and in 1596 portraits which threatened her image were destroyed
  • Her Golden Speech won lots of support in Parliament.
  • Her image as Gloriana was damaged
  • Factional struggles between Cecil and Essex damaged her reputation
  • Scandals undermined Elizabeths authority in court