A wide range of computing and communications devices - from standalone computers, to "connected" or networked computing and communications technologies, to the Internet itself
During Phase 1 (1950s and 1960s), ethical/social questions arose about the impact of computing machines as "giant brains" and what that meant for being human
In Phase 2 (1970s and 1980s), computing machines and communications devices began to converge, generating ethical/social issues around privacy, intellectual property, and computer crime
In Phase 3 (1990-present), the availability of Internet access to the general public has increased significantly, raising ethical and social concerns around free speech, anonymity, jurisdiction, and trust
Free speech: Can Internet users post any message they wish on publicly accessible websites or their own personal web pages?
Anonymity: Should Internet users be permitted to post anonymous messages on web pages or navigate the web anonymously or under the cover of a pseudonym?
Jurisdiction: Where will Internet crime be prosecuted, given the lack of clear national or geographical boundaries?
Trust: Concerns around doing online business (personal and financial information), public vs. private aspects of personal information, social networking sites, and interactive web-based forums
In Phase 4, computers are becoming less visible as distinct entities, as they continue to be miniaturized and integrated into ordinary objects, and blend unobtrusively into our surroundings
Cybertechnology is also becoming less distinguishable from other technologies as boundaries that have previously separated them begin to blur because of convergence
Two points of view on the uniqueness of cyberethics issues
Traditionalists argue that nothing is new - crime is crime, and murder is murder
Uniqueness Proponents argue that cybertechnology has introduced (at least some) new and unique ethical issues that could not have existed before computers
Traditionalists correctly point out that no new ethical issues have been introduced by computers, but uniqueness proponents are correct that cybertechnology has complicated our analysis of traditional ethical issues
How can I encourage the employer to pay attention to my résumé?
1. Show how your qualifications fit the job and the company
2. If people do the reading: your résumé may get a few seconds of the reader's attention to decide whether to choose the people for an interview or not
3. If the résumé is electronically scanned by computer into a job-applicant tracking system, then the employer specifies keywords from the job description, listing the knowledge, skills, and abilities that the ideal applicant would have, sometimes personal characteristics may also be included
4. The employer receives the résumés that match the keywords, arranged with the most "hits" first, then the employer decides who will be invited for interviews