Duck proposed a phase model of relationship breakdown
He argued that the ending of a relationship is not a one-off event but a process that takes time and goes through four distinct phases
Each phase is marked by one partner (or both) reaching a 'threshold', a point at which their perception of the relationship changes (usually for the worse)
The road to break-up begins once a partner realises that they are dissatisfied with the relationship and distressed about the way things are going
Intra-psychic phase
Threshold: 'I can'tstandthisanymore'
on cognitiveprocesses occurring within the individual
The dissatisfied partner worries about the reasons for his or her dissatisfaction, centring mostly on their partner'sshortcomings.
The partner mulls their thoughts over privately, and may share them with a trusted friend. They weigh up the pros and cons of the relationship and evaluate these against the alternatives (including being alone)
They begin to make plans for the future.
Dyadic phase
Threshold: 'I would be justified in withdrawing'
Focus on interpersonalprocesses between the two partners
There comes a point when they cannot avoid talking about their relationship any longer
Confrontations in which the relationship is discussed and dissatisfactions are aired
Dyadic phase:
These are characterised by anxiety complaints about lack of equity, resentment over imbalanced roles and a rethinking of the commitment that kept the partners together
There are two possible outcomes a determination to continue breaking up the relationship or a renewed desire to repair it
But if the rescue attempts fail, another threshold is reached.
Ironically, self-disclosures may become deeper and more frequent in this phase as partners expressthoughts and feelings they had been withholding in the intra-psychic phase
Social phase
Threshold: 'I mean it'
Focus on wider processes involving the couple's social networks
The break-up is made public
Partners will seek support
Mutual friends find they are expected to choose a side
Gossip is traded and encouraged. Some friends provide reinforcement and reassurance others will place the blame on one partner
Some may hasten the end of the relationship by providing previously secret information
Others may pitch in and try to help repair the relationship
This is usually the point of noreturn - the break-up takes on a momentum driven by social forces
Grave dressing phase
Threshold: 'It's now inevitable
The focus on the aftermath
Once the relationship is dead, the time comes to bury it, by 'spinning' a favourable story about the breakdown for public consumption
This allows the partners to maintain a positive reputation usually at the expense of the other partner showing them in a bad light
Gossip plays an important role in this phase
It is crucial that each partner tries to retain some 'social credit' (LaGaipa) by blaming circumstances your partner or everything but themselves
Grave dressing:
Involved creating a personal story you can live with which may differ from the public one
This is more to do with tidying up memories of the relationship, with a certain degree of rewriting of history
The traits you found endearing in your partner at the start of the relationship are now reinterpreted in a much more negative fashion
A 'wild and unpredictable nature' is now seen as an irresponsible failure to settle down.
The dissatisfied partner finally reaches the threshold, 'Time to get a new life.