De-individuation and Institutionalisation

Cards (9)

  • De-individuation
    The psychological state aroused when individuals join crowds or large groups, where they feel a 'cloak of anonymity' that diminishes personal consequences for their actions
  • Factors contributing to de-individuation
    • Anonymity (e.g. wearing a uniform)
    • Altered consciousness due to drugs or alcohol
  • The process of de-individuation
    1. People normally refrain from acting aggressively due to social norms and fear of identification
    2. Being anonymous in a crowd reduces inner restraints and increases usually inhibited behaviours
    3. Anonymity minimises concerns about evaluation by others, weakening barriers to anti-social behaviour based on guilt or shame
  • Research on de-individuation
    • Zimbardo et al's Stanford prison study (1972) - 'guards' wearing mirrored sunglasses acted aggressively towards 'prisoners'
    • Zhong (2010) - wearing mirrored sunglasses increases feelings of anonymity and de-individuation
  • Gender differences in de-individuation effects
    • Zimbardo (1969) - female undergraduates in de-individuated condition (hooded, no name tags) more likely to deliver shocks to a victim
  • Institutional aggression

    Aggression that occurs within the prison environment
  • Situational explanation: The deprivation model
    • Institutional aggression is a product of the stressful prison conditions, including loss of liberty, autonomy and security
    • Inmates cope through withdrawal or violence against others
    • Violence is a way to survive exploitation and gain respect/express loyalty
  • The role of prison characteristics
    • Overcrowding
    • High temperatures and noise predispose inmates to aggression
  • Dispositional explanation: The importation model
    • Inmates bring their violent pasts and survival skills to prison
    • Cultural belief systems like 'the code of the street' define behaviour, especially for gang members
    • Individual characteristics like anger, anti-social personality, impulsivity, and low self-control predict institutional aggression