Private sector companies given the chance to bid for services supplied by the public sector (i.e. school meals, hospital cleaning, building/road construction, various state projects)
Private sector under pressure to meet consumers' needs – efficient, provide good quality products, quicker service, reasonable prices
Exploitation of consumers – too high prices, aim is profit so quality could suffer in some cases in order to reduce costs, not everyone can afford their goods/services
Mass redundancies to cut costs which could weaken companies because of loss of experienced staff, undue pressure to raise productivity, stressful working environment – must adopt to flexible working practices
Job losses create a pressure necessary in order to compete global markets
Left without government support – need to face competition – main objective in now profitability
Increase of (foreign) investments, mergers and acquisitions (takeovers), diversification of business' activities which could benefit country's economic welfare and international competitiveness
Privatisation can be expensive (advertising), state assets in the event of emergency could be sold off too cheaply failing to maximise the revenue, hostile takeovers (company being taken over does not want or agree to) after privatisation
Huge amount of revenue injected to the state funds, problematic companies costing too much for government to operate are transferred to more experienced hands removing high expenses of the state (i.e. salaries)