Nick Broomfield on his style of filmmaking: '"If you're making a film, it's more honest to make your presence felt than to hang back furtively on the other side of the room, because no-one really benefits from that. That approach really is, to use the dread word, voyeuristic. You're there with all your equipment, but pretending you're not there."'
Nick Broomfield on his style of filmmaking: 'The reason why he uses a more participatory approach, he has explained, is because "what's important is the interaction between the filmmakers and those being filmed, and that the audience is aware of that interaction so they can make decisions of their own."'
At the age of 10 she was sent to a draconian all-girls boarding school, where she found it hard to make friends due to the mistress forbidding anyone to talk to her for a term after she became lost during a school trip
After a period of homelessness, Longinotto went on to Essex University to study English and European literature and later followed friend and future filmmaker, Nick Broomfield to the National Film and Television School
Moore, like Broomfield, is a very visible presence in his documentaries, which can thus be described as participatory and performative
His work is highly committed – overtly polemical in taking up a clear point of view, what might be called agit-prop documentary
He justifies his practice in terms of providing 'balance' for mainstream media that, in his view, provides false information
Part of Moore's approach is to use humour, sometimes to lampoon the subject of his work and sometimes to recognise that documentaries need to entertain and hold an audience
It is better to think of these 'theories' as a set of ideas/approaches that underpin their work stylistically and contextually as esteemed documentary filmmakers
These might be reinforced in relation to the film as a whole or to individual sequences however it might also be, that these ideas may well be contested also
Using the ideas behind the work of Kim Longinotto, Nick Broomfield and Michael Moore it is hoped will enlighten the study of one of the following chosen documentary films: Sisters in Law, The Arbor, Stories We Tell, 20,000 Days on Earth, Amy
Expository Documentaries aim to inform and/or persuade — often through omnipresent "Voice of God" narration over footage devoid of ambiguous or poetic rhetoric
Observational Documentaries aim to simply observe the world around them, giving first hand access to some of the subject's most important (and often private) moments
Participatory Documentaries include the filmmaker within the narrative, as minor as the filmmaker's voice being heard behind the camera, prodding subjects with questions or cues
Reflexive Documentaries draw attention to their own constructedness and artifice, making the audience aware that what they are watching is a representation of reality, not reality itself
Originating in the 1960s with the advances in portable film equipment
Much less pointed than the Expository
Attempt to give voice to all sides of an issue by giving audiences first hand access to some of the subject's most important (and often private) moments
An experimental combination of styles used to stress subject experience and share an emotional response to the world
Often connect personal accounts or experience juxtaposed with larger political or historical issues
Sometimes called the "Michael Moore" style, as he often uses his own personal stories as a way to construct social truths (without having to argue the validity of their experiences)
COMPONENT 2 - Written Exam 2 hours 30 minutes (total 100 marks) - Section B: Documentary film (20 marks) - Study of one documentary text with a focus on critical debates and filmmakers 'theories'