Types of Precedent

Cards (8)

  • Binding Precedent = a precedent that has been set by a HIGHER court in a previous case which must be followed by a LOWER court in a case with similar facts.
  • R v Gotts -
    CoA followed the obiter dicta statement in the earlier case of R v Howe and set a new binding precedent all lower courts must follow.
  • Original Precedent = where a point of law has NEVER been decided before and so the decision the judge makes will form a NEW precedent for later cases to follow.
  • Gillick -
    The courts decided that if it is in the best interest and the welfare of the child, a doctor is under no obligation to inform parents of private and confidential medical treatment.
  • Persuasive Precedent = not binding but can be considered when they are trying to decide a case.
  • Decisions made by lower courts -
    R v R
    The HoL agreed with and followed the CoA ruling that D could be guilty of raping his wife, despite the decision not being binding on them.
  • Dissenting Judgements -
    Hedley Bryne
    The HoL chose to follow Lord Dennings dissenting judgement in Candler v Christmas Crane rather than the majority verdict of the CoA.
  • Obiter Dicta Statements -
    R v Gotts
    The judge followed the obiter dicta statement in R v Howe and decided that duress could not be used as a defence to attempted murder.