Social pragmatic theory (e.g., Bloom, 2000; Tomasello, 2003)
Association
Idea that child thinks new words refer to whichever salient object their attention has been drawn to
Doesn't easily explain how abstract words are acquired
Constraints
Whole object constraint
Taxonomic assumption
Mutual exclusivity assumption
Mutual exclusivity
Is this ME constraint specifically lexical and inbuilt?
Markman: Yes, specifically lexical and innate
Clark: ME is just a specific manifestation of general pragmatic principles
Callanan: The pragmatic principles themselves can be learnt
Syntactic bootstrapping
Linguistic context can help us guess the meanings of words
Social-Pragmatic Theory
Children learn words easily because:
Their world is very routine
They engage in joint attention and intention reading
Not all of these theories of word learning are mutually exclusive
Children draw on many strategies and sources of information to learn words
Lack of a unified developmental theory of word learning (though see the Emergentist Coalition Model, Hollich et al., 2000)
By the age of 6 children have something in the region of 10 – 14, 000 words in their lexicon
The learning rate continues to accelerate until about 8 – 10 years when children learn something like 12 new words a day
Enormous individual differences in rate of language learning
Early individual differences in conventional language learning predict:
later vocabulary
grammatical development
narrative development
Language skills at age 5 are the most important factor in reaching the expected levels in English and maths at age 11 and are positively correlated later academic achievement
Children with poor vocabulary skills (at 5 years old) are twice as likely to be unemployed when they reach adulthood
60% -70 % of young offenders have low language skills
Ineffective acquisition of early language is associated with behavioural problems including higher levels of disruptive and antisocial behaviour
There is a higher rate of past, early language problems among adults with anxiety or social phobia disorders
Language as a public health problem
Language as a primary indicator of child wellbeing (association with social, emotional & learning outcomes)
What impacts on language development?
Bronfenbrenner (1979)
Pace et al., 2017
Child Directed speech
Quantity and quality language input affects language growth
Sheer amount of speech (> Adult words > child language)
Diversity/complexity of vocabulary and grammar
Large effect sizes for quality
Caregiver Contingency at 11months predicts infant vocabulary to 18m
Decontextualised talk at 3 predicts vocabulary at 4.5
SES
an individual's location in multiple environmental hierarchies, usually involving economic resources, educational achievement, and occupational status
Disparities between infants from higher- and lower-SES families in vocabulary and language processing efficiency are evident at 18m
By 24 months there was a six-month gap between SES groups in processing skills critical to language development
The UK prevalence rate for early language difficulties is between 5% and 8% of all children, and 20% for those growing up in low-income households
One child in three of the poorest children in England starts primary school without the language skills they need to succeed
Difference or deficit?
Language for life or language for testing?
Impacts of social distancing measures due to Covid-19 may have devastating long-lasting consequences for young children in low-income families
Variation within SES groups, the importance of overheard speech and non-dyadic interactions
Large SES differences in studies measuring only child-directed speech, but no SES difference in all speech in a child's environment
Quantity of speech to infants, three times greater in urban compared to rural samples
Ratio was much larger than that found for samples of high versus low socioeconomic status in USA