Bowlby (1988) rejected the learning theory for attachment
Bowlby put forward a theory of attachment based on ethologist's work
Bowlby was inspired by Lorenz's Geese study and Harlow's monkeys
Bowlby proposed the evolutionary theory of attachment
Bowlby say humans just like other animals- attachment is an innate system that promotes survival
Bowlby's theory focuses on the following concepts:
Monotropy
Social releasers
Critical period
Internal working model
Monotropy- a concept that infants have an innate capacity to attach primarily to one caregiver
Bowlby said that the primary attachment is the most important, who is often the mother, but not always the biological mother
The law of continuity- the more predictable and consistent a child's care is, the better the quality of attachment
The law of accumulated separation- all separations from the mother add together, therefore zero separation is best
Infants and carers are innately programmed to become attached
Babies are born with innate cute behaviours and features called social releasers
Social releasers are designed to elicit a caregiver response in others
Social releasers help babies to ensure their own survival
Bowlby recognised that attachment was a reciprocal process as both baby and caregiver are 'hard-wired' to become attached
Innate behaviours usually have a special time period for the development of an attachment
The infant attachment system is active around 6 months
Bowlby suggested that the critical period was around 2 years for humans. He later revised this to say there was also a sensitive period that lasted 5 years
If an attachment does not form during the sensitive period, it may be difficult to form attachments in the future
Bowlby suggested that infants develop a mental representation of their first attachment
The internal working model has a profound influence on the way the child relates to people and acts as a parent later in life
having a loving relationship with a reliable carer will cause the infant to expect loving, reliable relationships in the future
Poor treatment from carer will result in the infant expecting poor treatment in their other relationships
People tend to base their parenting style on their own experiences being parented
Children from functional families, tend to have functional families themselves
STRENGTHS
support for IWM- Bailey et al (2007) found that patterns of attachment are present, those who have poor attachments with their primary attachment figure were more likely to have poorly attached babies
Support for social releasers- Brazelton et al (1975) found babies became distressed, curled up and motionless when their primary attachment figure did not respond to their social releasers
LIMITATIONS
Learning theory is an alternative explanation- attachment is formed through classical and operant conditioning
Socially sensitive concept- Burman (1994) proposed the monotropic theory places a huge burden on the responsibility of mothers, law of accumulated separation