At least one factor of production is fixed (e.g capital). Output can onle be increased by increasing quantity of a variable factor (e.g labour)
Total, average and marginal products
total product - total quantity of outputs produced by a given number of inputs and time period
average product - total product/no. of workers
marginal product - the addition to total output produced by an extra unit (employer)
NOTE: product = returns = output
Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns
As variable factors (workers) are added, the marginal output falls
Initially, there is increasing marginal returns as:
specialisation
teamwork
However as optimum capacity limits are approached, eventually each additional unit of labour employed adds less to total output than the previous one, due to:
workers queuing for equipment
workers getting in each others way
This will also lead to rising marginal costs, and marginal returns eventually become negative leading to a fall in total returns, total output falls
Relationship between MP and AP curves
When MP>AP, pulls AP up
When MP<AP, drags AP down
therefore MP cuts AP at its highest point
Fixed Costs
Fixed costs are costs that remain constant as output increases e.g business rates, rent, insurance
Average fixed costs fall continuously as output increases because total fixed costs are being spread over a higher level of production
Variable Costs
Costs which vary directly with output e.g raw materials and labour
Real world
costs rise at a slower rate initially - specialisation + teamwork
costs rise at a faster rate - DMC reasons
Total Cost
TC = FC + TVC
Marginal and Variable Cost Curves
NOTE: marginal - tick shape
variable - u shape
As marginal costs are the addition to total costs, they are the same as variable costs eg raw materials
Cost Formulas
Marginal Cost MC is change in Total Cost/change in output
Average costs AC - total cost / output
Average variable costs AVC - total variable costs / output
Average fixed costs AFC - total fixed costs / output
Average total cost - AVC + AFC
Revenues - Def and Formula
TR - total amount of money received from sale of an output
TR - Price x Quantity
AR - average per unit sold
AR - TR/Quantity
MR - additional revenue from selling one extra unit of output
MR - changeTR/changeQuantity
Revenue Curves
Diagram 1 - Average and Marginal Revenue
AR follows same rules as demand curve
MR goes under graph as it becomes negative due to law of diminishing returns
Diagram 2 - Total Revnue
past Q1 TR falls as MR becomes negative (law of DMR)
Profits
Profit = TR - TC
Normal profits = amount of profits required to keep resources in their present use
Abnormal profits = profit over and above normal profit
NOTE: TC = TR does not mean zero profits/break even
Long run
All quantity of all factors of production can be varied (capital)
e.g output can be released by moving to a new scale of production (new factory/equipment)
Internal Economies of Scale
Shows the reduction in unit costs as a result of an increase in scale of factors of production, and therefore generates cost advantages.
Internal economies of scale types
Technical economies
specialist machinery
law of increased dimensions
Marketing economies
strong bargaining/monopsony power over suppliers and workers
marketing - cost of advertisement is fixed
bulk buying
Labour economies of scale
specialisation
managerialeconomics
Financial economies
larger firms will likely have a better credit rating, therefor can obtain loans more frequently and cheaply as they are lower risk
Econonies of scale diagram
The minimum efficient scale is where the internal economies of scale have been fully exploited abd is where productive efficiency occurs
Envelope Curve
Each SRAS curve represents a different factory/scale of operation
falling LRAS - economies of scale
rising LRAS - diseconomies of scale
MES is the scale of production where economies of scale have been fully exploited
Internal Diseconomies of Scale
leads to a rise in firm's LRAC, results from firms expanding beyond optimum size and losing productive efficiency, resulting in rise in price levels
Control and Communication - may find problems in monitoring productivity and work quality, wastes resources and increases costs
Co-operation - workers may feel alienated and a loss of morale, thus affecting productivity and wastage, leading to higher AC
External economies of scale
Fall in average cost due to being part of an industry
Labour - Concentration of workers in a specific area can lead to a large pool of skilled workers. Recruitment costs are reduced - fall in AC
Specialist Suppliers - It may become more profitable for firms in other industries to specialise making components for the larger one. Firms tend to be close to centre of manufacturing - fall in delay/distribution costs - fall in ac
Types of external economies of scale (2)
Co-operation - Firms may cooperate if concentrated - fall in ac’s
Transportation - Good transportation network benefits firms via improved delivery system - fall in distribution costs - fall in ac’s
Minimum efficient scale (MES)
the scale of production where the internal economies of scale have been fully exploited, it's the point of productive efficiency in the long run
External Disecononies of Scale Diagram
External Diseconomies are rising long run that result from being part of an industry (geographical concentration). Causes shifts in LRAC curve and other increases costs of production for all firms in the industry
3 examples of external diseconomies of scale
. Local Labour becomes scarce and firms have to offer higher wages to attract and retain new workers
. Local roads are congested so transport costs begin to rise
. Land and factories become scarce and rents begin to rise
Advantages of EOS
. Economies of scale lead to lower unit costs which can be passed onto consumers in the form of lower prices
. Higher sales and profits can be reinvested into R&D, leading to new products and dynamic efficiency
Disadvantages of EOS
. Firms may not reduce prices and instead take a higher profit margin instead
. Market demand may be insufficient for economies of scale to be fully exploited
. Businesses may use EOS to build monopoly power, which may lead to higher prices and a fall in consumer welfare
. EOS may be used as a barrier to entry and drive down prices to squeeze out smaller firms, limiting competition
. In 2017 Uber was the most loss making private company in tech history suggesting EOS have not led to profits yet
AO4 Economies of Scale
. Firms may become so big that they suffer diseconomies of scale, however DOS may likely be offset by significant economies (e.g car manufacturing)
. Nature of production may influence size of MES relative to market demand, may be very small (e.g hairdressing vs aircraft)
. Small businesses can still survive even if industries dominated by large businesses (niche products)
. May or may not accelerate R&D and innovation, as smaller firms may be squeezed out by larger firms and limit innovation