Electoral Systems

Cards (26)

  • AMS
    Mixed system
  • Impact of AMS
    Coalition or minority govt more common
    Parties have to work together to pass legislation
  • Advantages of AMS
    Proportional result- more seats party gains in constituents, harder to gain seats regionally, reduces wasted votes, more paties represented
    Split-ticket voting- More choice, and with second vote can vote for diff party, encourages more parties to run
    Govt with broad popularity- must be popular across whole country, if coalitions lots of parties have input on policy, greater legitimacy
    Greater representation- all areas represented by constituence and regional representatives more chance that voter share ideology with rep, increases turnout
  • Disadvantages of AMS
    Complicated- what happens after voting not simple, put voters off as feel vote be manipulated, decrease turnout
    Coalition more likely- govt weaker, difficult to pass policies in manifesto
    First round- constituency vote of AMS uses FPTP so has same disadvantages as FPTP
    Party control- in regional vote party control of list of candidates, voters only choice to support list or not, excessive influence to party leadership
  • SV
    Majoritarian system
  • SV Advantages
    Majority result - increases legitimacy, keep extremes out of power, strong and stable govt
    More voter choice
    Simple- easy to understand
  • SV Disadvantages
    2 party dominance- 3rd party unlikely to do well, result not proportional, encourages tactical use of 2nd vote, discourages turnout
    False majority- 2nd round voters whose candidates eliminated their vote doesn't count
    Wasted vote- wasted vote have little or no impact on outcome of election
  • SV
    Produce single party strong stable govt
    Lead to 2 party dominance
  • SV
    Mayoral election
    Police, Crime comissioner
  • SV
    2016 mayoral election turnout 45%
    If voters choose to express no 2nd preference or if 2nd preference is for eliminated candidate, influence reduced
    2021 turnout dropped to 41.2%
  • STV
    Northern Ireland Assembly
    European Parliament elections
    NI, Scottish council elections
  • STV Advantages
    Broadly proportional outcome, ensures votes are of equal value
    Variety of choices
    Govt consist of party/s that win over 50% of vote, in NI power sharing between rivals, helped end 30 yr violence
    Helps small parties and independent candidate be elected
  • STV Disadvantages
    Not fully proportional
    Complex- vote counting complicated and take long time
    Large multi-member constituencies weaken MP constituency link - line of accountability unclear
    Coalition govt - unstable, disproportionate influence to smaller parties, e.g. NI executive suspended several times in early yrs, inc 2002-2007 as result of breakdown in trust, cooperation broke down again in 2017 - triggering further elections
  • STV
    Proportional representation
  • STV
    Coalition likely
    Parties have to work together
    With multi-member constituencies in electoral process, likelihood of safe seat significantly reduced and value of each vote more equal
  • FPTP
    Plurality system
  • FPTP Advantages
    Simple- encourage people to turnout, legitimacy of electoral system, cost-effective election, quick legitimate result
  • FPTP Advantages
    Strong, clear winner- winner bonus, party can carry out manifesto
  • Winners bonus
    Get extra prize (extra n.o of seats)
    E.g. if won 40 seats, winner bonus make it like they got 60 votes
    It's to make it clear who won
  • FPTP Advantage
    MP-constituent link- clear accountability, effective local rep, more likely to help locals so get re-elected
  • FPTP Advantage
    Centrist policies- ensure majority of UK population represented as leaders introduce policies that are popular with people so get elected, exclude extremist parties
  • Disadvantages FPTP
    Lack of voter choice- reduced turnout, tactical voting
    Unequal vote value- vote of one person more valuable depending on where they live, undermines principles of democracy
    No majority needed- more people can vote against winning candidate than for them, undermine legitimacy, waste vote for those who voted for losing candidate
    Disproportionate result- 2 main parties over-represented cuz of winner bonus while other parties under-represented
  • FPTP
    Majority govt
    Promote 2 party system - adversarial politics
    Smaller parties less influence
  • FPTP- no majority needed

    2019 229/650 seats won with less than 50% majority
  • FPTP - winners bonus
    Cons took 43.6% vote but had 56.2% seat
  • FPTP- lack of voter choice
    70 parties ran in 2019 but only 10 gained seats