Farm dogs are essential components of farm productivity
What information is lacking on farm dogs?
How many?
What types?
No information currently on energy or nutrient requirements
Not sure if farmers are getting optimum performance from their dogs
Ministry of Primary Industries (MPI) Export $$ (2016-17)
Meat Products - $5,985m - 12%
Dairy Products - $11,549m - 23%
Wool - $586m - 1.2%
Total Agriculture - $29,232m - 60%
Total - $48,720m
The survey obtained information on farm size, dog breed & numbers, working & feeding patterns
The survey concentrated on assessing whether working farm dogs are receiving adequate energy from their diet
Diets Fed to Working Farm Dogs
40% dry food & 40% homekill
Remainder canned food, dog roll or table scraps
No significant regional variations in feeding regimes
Type of dog food
Dry (biscuit or kibble) - Overall Average 39.9%, During Peak work 39.7%, During Off-peak Periods 40.1%
Canned - Overall Average 2.9%, During Peak work 3.0%, During Off-peak Periods 2.8%
Dog roll - Overall Average 11.9%, During Peak work 11.6%, During Off-peak Periods 12.1%
Homekill meat - Overall Average 38.7%, During Peak work 39.5%, During Off-peak Periods 38.0%
Table scraps - Overall Average 6.6%, During Peak work 6.2%, During Off-peak Periods 7.0%
The main brands of dog food bought by the farmers were: TUX Energy (82%), Pedigree Working Dog Formula (11%), TUX Country (4%), Champ Max (2%), Dog Chow (0.5%) and V8 (0.3%)
The majority of farmers gave TUX dog food a ranking of either 3 (23 %), 4 (33 %) or 5 (34 %), (scale 1 = very poor to 5 = very good)
67% rated TUX as good or very good
Conclusions from the Survey I
Very young population of working dogs, median of 3 years
High proportion of younger dogs similar to pet populations overseas
Higher population of Heading dogs
Skewed sex ratio similar to pet populations overseas with higher numbers of males
Conclusions from the Survey II
The most common diet of a working farm dog was primarily homekill combined with dry food (TUX)
Amount fed to the dogs altered during the year (peak vs off-peak) rather than the composition of the diet
The majority of farmers reported that dry food was fed as a top-up to homekill
The majority of farmers replied nutrition, dog's acceptance and balanced diet was very important when choosing dog food
Conclusions from the Survey III
Majority (82%) fed TUX
Farmers have generally positive views on TUX
Working dog population
Very young median age of 3 years
High proportion of younger dogs similar to pet populations overseas
Higher population of Heading dogs
Skewed sex ratio with higher numbers of males (60-54% vs 53.8-50.4% in overseas studies)
Common diet of working farm dogs
Primarily homekill combined with dry food (TUX)
Amount fed altered during the year (peak vs off-peak) rather than the composition of the diet
Majority of farmers fed dry food (TUX) as a top-up to homekill
Nutrition, dog's acceptance and balanced diet
Very important factors when choosing dog food for farmers
Farmers' views on TUX
Majority (82%) fed TUX
Generally positive views
Would like a specially formulated working dog formula
Would like a higher calorie option
Would like life-stage formulations (such as puppy formulations)
Digestibility trials
Important in establishing the nutrient requirements of an animal to ensure proper nutrition
Involves feeding an animal a diet, collecting faeces and analysing food and faeces
Establish the amount of nutrients an animal is absorbing and utilising from its food
Digestibility trials are the "gold standard" for measuring energy expenditure, but are costly
Doubly-Labelled Water (DLW) is used to measure energy expenditure in free-living animals
DLW method
1. Known amounts of DLW (18O & 2H) injected
2. Energy expenditure measured by the rate of decline of the two isotopes (18O & 2H) over the experimental period
3. 18O is lost in CO2 & H2O but the 2H is only lost in water
4. The difference in disappearance of the two isotopes from blood is used to measure CO2 production during the period
5. CO2 production is used to measure EE
Advantage of the DLW method is that it allows animals to move freely with no housing constraints
Heading dogs were 44% more active than Huntaways in this pilot study
Kcal per activity count
The amount of energy expenditure (in kcal) per activity count measured by the Actical® monitors
Heading dogs had a higher Kcal per activity count (0.00032) compared to Huntaways (0.00022)