The behaviourist approach is overly simplistic, offering a reductionist view of behaviour which ignores key factors such as personality, cognition, culture
Scientific methodology is not necessarily the best way to study human behaviour: humans are more nuanced and sophisticated than a single quantitative finding may suggest
The Behaviourist Approach is overly deterministic and negates the idea of free will as presented in the Humanistic Approach
The Behaviourist Approach claims that people are products of environmental forces and have little control over their behavioural responses as opposed to the Humanistic Approach's insistence that humans have free will
Pavlov, a physiologist, was measuring the volume of specific enzymes in dog saliva when he noticed that the dogs began to salivate before they saw or smelt their food - in fact they began to salivate when they heard the footsteps of the lab assistants approaching
1. The dog is given food as usual (unconditioned stimulus)
2. The dog salivates when it sees and smells the food (unconditioned response)
3. A bell is sounded (neutral stimulus) every time the dog is given food (unconditioned stimulus)
4. A bell is sounded every time the food is presented (the pairing of neutral and unconditioned stimuli)
5. After repeated pairings the dog salivates when it hears the bell (the bell has become the conditioned stimulus and the dog salivating to the bell has become the conditioned response)
6. When Pavlov stopped pairing the bell and the food he found that the conditioned response decreased and gradually disappeared (known as 'extinction')
Learning via consequence, where some behaviours will be repeated based on their positive consequences and some behaviours will not be repeated based on their negative consequences
1. A rat is placed in a specially designed box (known as a 'Skinner box')
2. The box contains a lever which the rat can press
3. When the rat presses the lever a food pellet (the reward) is dispensed
4. The rat learns to press the lever via ratios e.g. every 10th press dispenses food or intervals e.g. food is dispensed after every 5 minutes (known as 'schedules of reinforcement')
It is more ethical to use animals in research than it is to use humans (although some would disagree with this)
Operant conditioning has good application to educational settings and prisons (e.g. the use of token economies draws directly from operant conditioning)
Whilst conditioning may explain some forms of behaviour, it cannot explain all behaviour for example: behaviour which is spontaneous or original, behaviour where no reward is sought, behaviour which goes against what has been learnt via the environment
Conditioning experiments are often performed on animals, the findings of which cannot be generalised to human behaviour
Both classical and operant conditioning (and behaviourism generally) are highly deterministic
They assume that a specific response will follow a specific stimulus (classical conditioning) or that only behaviours which bring rewards are likely to be repeated (operant conditioning). There is little room for free will in conditioning; the assumption is that people are controlled by environmental forces and have little autonomy over their own destiny.
Both positive and negative reinforcement encourage the behaviour, increasing its likelihood, whereas punishment discourages the behaviour, decreasing the likelihood of it being repeated