Damages are an award of money to compensate a claimant who has suffered a loss or damage due to D's breach of contract
Always available as a remedy when a term has been broken - this can include non-performance, loss of profits or physical damage/harm
Court aims to put C back into the position they would have been in if the contract was completed as agreed
Damages cannot be rewarded if the loss is 'too remote'
Nominal damages
This is awarded when there is no loss suffered - Staniforth v Lyall
Damages are awarded for the breach rather than the loss suffered
'Wrotham Park award' from the case of Wrotham Park v Parkside Homes gives the courts instructions on how to calculate damages
Should only be awarded when there are issues calculating C's financial loss - Morris-Garner v One Stop
Speculative damages
Cover situations which haven't happened or are difficult to quantify
Damages can't usually be claimed for mental distress in a commercial contract - Addis v The Gramophone
Damages can be awarded of a 'speculative nature' for mental distress if the entire point of the contract is for pleasure - Jackson v Horizon Holidays
Damages can be claimed for a loss of amenity (reduction of your ability to do something) - Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth
Liquidated damages
Amount of damages to be paid is a term of thecontract
If the amount isn't accurate, the amount must be fair
The party must show that the clause was to protect the parties involved and neither extortionate nor unreasonable
Penalties are not liquidated damages - ParkingEye v Beavis
Compensatory Damages
3 stage test is used to inform whether someone is entitled to the award of damages, not amount
CIF is considered to assess whether D factually caused the breach and if it was reasonably foreseeable - Monarch Steamship
Remoteness is where the court must consider whether the breach was too remote and therefore not foreseeable - Hadley v Baxendale (was the loss reasonable foreseeable and did D have knowledge of the loss?)
Mitigation of loss is where D must do what was reasonable to mitigate their loss in the circumstances - White and Carter v McGregor
Assessing how much to award in compensatory damages
Quantum Meruit: Paying C for the amount of work they have done, if no amount is specified then the court will award a reasonable amount - URDC v Powell
Loss of Bargain: Aims to put C in the same financial position they would have peen in had the contract been performed, this looks at the difference in value between what was/should have been provided and contract/market prices - Chaplin v Hicks
Reliance Loss: C claims expenses occurred as a result of the contract not being performed or money spent to fulfil their obligations - Anglia v Reed