material deprivation is when a pupil is unable to afford the fundamental learning materials, such as textbooks, stationary etc, need to thrive academically
material deprivation typically hinders a pupil's chances of reaching their full potential, as they lack the basic resources to do so
Howard suggests that a poor diet leads to a lower intake of crucial vitamins, which leads to ill health and by extension poor attendance, resulting in a pupil falling behind in school work
Waldfogel and Washbrook suggest that poor living conditions, such as dampness, overcrowding or a lack of privacy to study are likely to affect w/c pupils, who may come from families who are unable to afford better housing
Tanner suggests that pupils who come from low-income households are more likely to underachieve, high costs of uniform and learning materials disadvantage w/c pupils
Bernstein & Language Codes
suggests that m/c families are more likely to communicate in the elaborated code, which uses complex sentences and rich vocabulary
this elaborated code is mirrored by the education system, through the teachers and in textbooks and exam papers
on the contrary, w/c families are more likely to speak in the restricted code which uses simple and gramitically limited language
poorer w/c parents are less likely to be able to afford pre-school or nursery facilities, such as Surestart, this may affect their child's development compared to other children who have had access to such facilities
Parents’ Attitude
Sugaman argues that m/c parents are more likely to practise deferred gratification, stressing importance on long periods in education being a great investment for the future
on the contrary, w/c families harbour more fatalistic views, and so practise immediate gratification
Feinsten
argues that the extent of parents’ education can have an effect on a pupil’s educational achievement
found that m/c parents had more social capital, and therefore knew how to “work the system”, with their good negotiation skills and extensive expertise on how to navigate the education system
statistically, pupils from working class backgrounds are more likely to underachieve than those from a middle class background
Ball argued that although school is free for all, the addedcosts to equipment and experiences that may enhance educational achievement may cause w/c pupils to missout
Callender & Jackson (2005)
conducted a survey and found that w/c pupils were more debt-averse, and therefore viewed debt as something to be avoided
attitude to debt is an important factor when deciding whether to apply to university or not
the most debt-averse pupils were seen to apply to university five times less likely than their m/c counterparts
Reay
found that w/c pupils are more likely to apply for unis within their catchment area, as a means of saving money on the cost of commuting, even if it meant having less of a chance at a higher status uni