Temporary conditions that can support a diminished responsibility defence
Post-natal depression (as outlined in Reynolds)
Battered spouse syndrome (as shown in Ahluwalia)
Pre-menstrual tension (as outlined in Smith)
Depression and other mental disorders such as schizophrenia (as outlined in Gittens and Deitschmann)
Generally, intoxication cannot support a defence of diminished responsibility (as outlined in Di Duca)
Alcohol Dependency Syndrome
Can be a Recognised Medical Condition (RMC) (as outlined in Wood and Stewart)
Alcohol related brain damage from prolonged abuse of alcohol and drugs
Can qualify as a Recognised Medical Condition (RMC) (as seen in Woods)
Physical conditions that can affect mental functioning
Epilepsy
Sleep disorder
Diabetes (as outlined in Campbell)
Thirdly, under S. 52(1)(b), the abnormality of mental functioning must substantially impair the D's ability to do one or more of the things mentioned under subsection1A.
the things mentioned are:
understand the nature of his conduct (they don't understand what they are doing)
form a rational judgement (lack of thinking)
exercise self-control (they lack control)
in the recent case of Golds, the court said in order for it to be substantial, it must be something that made a great difference.
Finally, under S. 52(1)(c), the abnormality of mental functioning must provide an explanation for the killing
S. 52(1b) provide that the abnormality of mental functioning can be a significant contributory factor and so there can be other factors too. This is illustrated in cases like Deitschmann