Contract Terms

Cards (19)

  • Shat are express terms?
    Terms which have been specifically agreed to by both parties
  • What are implied terms?
    Not expressly discussed between parties but are terms that both parties would have intended to be included
    Implied terms can also be implied into a contract by common law or statute
  • What is a condition term?
    High importance
    A breach of this will end the contract (repudiation)
  • What case shows a condition term?
    Poussard v Spiers and Bond
  • What is a warranty term?

    A minor term of the contract
    A breach will not end the contract but it will result in damages
  • What case shows a warranty term?
    Bettini v Gye
  • What is an innominate term?
    A term that does not fall under ‘condition or warranty’
    A breach of an innominate term could be to create a condition or a warranty
  • What case shows an innominate term?
    Hong Kong shipping co
  • In determining whether we have a term of representation, the courts must consider?
    1 the importance attached to the representation
    2 special knowledge or skill of the person making the statement
    3 any time lag between the statement and contract
    4 whether there is a written contract
  • What case links to the importance attached to representation?
    Couchman V Hill
  • What case links to special knowledge or skill of the person?
    Oscar chess v Williams
  • What case links to a time lag?
    Routledge v Mackay
  • What case links to a written contract?
    Routledge v Mackay
  • What is Business efficacy?
    Is the term necessary to make the contract effective
  • What is the officious Bystander test?
    Would the parties to the contract have agreed that the suggested term was obviously going to be in the contract
  • What case is linked to business efficacy?
    The Moorcook
  • What case is linked to the officious Bystander test?

    Shell uk v Lodstock garage
  • What does the case of Hutton v Warren say?
    Local customs will be implied into contracts
  • What does the case of Hlilas V Arcos say about prior dealings?
    Prior conduct of the parties may indicate terms to be implied