Law in different contexts and parts of life for Muslims
Shari'a has been used as
Civil law
Religious law
General moral guide
Shari'a has been interpreted very differently in different parts of the world
Human interpretations of shari'a in the light of new circumstances have been made
This is an area about which different views are held
Some Muslims question the validity of this approach
Matters where Muslims choose shari'a law
Civil matters, such as in the writing of a Nikah wedding contract
Family matters
Shari'a courts exist in some countries, including the UK, for those who choose to use them to resolve relevant matters
Categories of action in religious matters derived from shari'a
Wajib (compulsory)
Haram (forbidden)
Shari'a as a general moral guide
To tell the truth and be fair in trade and business
Shari'a courts
Similar to secular courts, with a judge (qazi) and witnesses
Different in that evidence from women and non-Muslims is given less weight in cases
This has led to criticism
Approaches to shari'a in different countries
Strict versions imposed using literal interpretations of the practices of seventh century Arabia (e.g. Iran, Saudi Arabia)
Secular law used (e.g. Turkey)
Dual system (e.g. Pakistan)
Imitation (taqlid)
Early scholars (mujtahids) made rulings which later scholars copy and apply to new questions
Many do not like to make fresh rulings because they do not know enough about Muhammad's examples compared to the scholars of early times, so they prefer to imitate them
Fresh re-interpretations (ijtihad)
Some make fresh re-interpretations to answer new issues
Shi'a scholars have always accepted reasoning (aql) but some Sunnis reject ijtihad since the teachings of medieval scholar Al-Ghazali, who said that the gates of ijtihad were closed