Influence of early attachments on later relationships

Cards (9)

  • Outline a study which has shown a link between romantic relationships and early attachment
    Hazan and Shaver (1987):
    1. Current/most important relationship
    2. Attitudes towards love (assessment of IWM)
    3. Current and childhood attachments
  • Findings of Hazan and Schaffers study
    A positive correlation between attachment type and experiences of love
    • Secure attachment= Romantic relationships lasted on average 10 years
    • insecure-resistant= 5 years
    • insecure-avoidant= 6 years
  • Describe the Minnesota parent-child study (2005)

    Followed ptpts from infancy to late adolescence
    Securely attached infants- highest rated for social competence, less isolated and more popular in later childhood.
  • Describe the study carried out by Myron-Wilson & Smith (1998)
    Assessed children aged between 7 and 11 from London using questionnaires
    Found secure children= less likely to be involved in bullying
    Insecure-resistant= more likely to be bullies
    Insecure-avoidant= more likely to be victims of bullying
  • Outline a study which has shown a link between poor parenting and early attachment
    Bailey et al. (2007):
    Assessed 99 mothers with 1-year old baby on quality of attachment using Strange Situation
    Also assessed quality of attachment of mothers with their own mothers when they were a child using an interview
  • What were the findings of Bailey et al.'s study?
    Mothers who had poor attachments with their own mothers= more likely to have poor attachments with their own child
  • Abundance of research support study
    McCarthy (1999):
    Wanted to see if there was a relationship between an infant's attachment type and their adult relationships. They found that securely attached individuals has the best friendships and relationships. This increases the validity and reliability
  • Abundance of research support COUNTER
    Zimmerman et al (2000):
  • Limitations of Hazan and Shavers research
    1. Volunteer sample - results may not be representative
    2. Social desirability bias - not accurate or objective answers
    3. Correlational nature of the study means they can't infer cause and effect relationships