Posting a sum of money to secure the release of the accused and guarantee a persons appearance at trial
Bail
-police decides to hold the accused in custody into their trial
-section 11(e) guarantees the accused right to not be denied reasonable bail
Prohibiting release of the accused (bail)
-law enforcement: accused poses a danger to the public
-accused will not show up for trial
-reverse onus provision: shift in responsibility requiring thee accused to justify why they should be released
Burden of proof
Crown must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt
Reasonable doubt
Honest and moral doubt to whether the accused is guilty of the crime. If the Crown is unable to satisfy the burden of proof the accused must be acquitted/not guilty
Wrongful convictions
Unsolved crimes like murder
Wrongful convictions
Trial errors: Crown just trying to prove guilt without searching for the truth and ignores the presumption of innocence and right to a fair trial
Wrongful convictions
Desire to solve is to seek evidence to support theories and discount evidence that disproves it
Wrongful convictions
Weak evidence council does not stand up for accused rights
Wrongful convictions
Discrimination of racial biases
Wrongful convictions
Convictions despite doubt: guilt is not proven beyond a reasonable doubt and troubles with the review process
Sentencing
Protecting society, preventing re-offenders and condemning criminal acts
Objectives when sentencing
Denunciation: society's feelings and past criminal behaviour come into consideration when sentencing. It works well when criminals plan their crime
Objectives when sentencing
Separation of the offender: keep offender away form the public
Objectives when sentencing
specific deterrence: stop someone from re offending general deterrence: stop society from committing the same crime
Objectives when sentencing
Rehabilitation is to treat and improve the offender and focuses on particular needs
Objectives when sentencing
Reparation and promoting responsibility: reparation's are payment for injuries/harm done
Restorative justice
Offenders accept responsibility for their actions. Judges consider different sentencing based on the circumstances of the case
Considerations ~ Cruel and Unusual punishment
Court looks at the harm done and how much to blame on their offender for their actions (can be challenged)
Considerations ~ Aggravating & Mitigating factors
aggravating: repeated offences, abuse, criminal organization, terrorism, or warrant a harsher sentencing
Considerations ~ Parity & Totality
parity: judges do not mark different sentences to the offenders in highly comparable cases totality: consecutive sentences are imposed, the combined sentences should not be harsh
Considerations ~ Restraint
Judges must use restraint from long sentencing if another option is there, like restorative justice
Criminology
Analyze the nature, causes and means of dealing with crime
Criminology
-why do people commit criminal acts
-why do we consider certain behaviours criminal and others as bad
-how our society can reduce criminal activity
Criminal code of Canada
controversies: deterring personal revenge, legal paternalism that prohibits self harm, and enforcement of morality