Avoidance → effort to keep away from the phonic stimulus - makes it hard to go about daily life
Endurance → in unavoidable situations
Phobia definition
Anxiety disorder
Irrational or disproportional fear that produces a conscious avoidance of the feared object or situation
Maladaptive and disruptive to everyday life
Cognitive characteristics of phobias
Selective attention to the phobic stimulus (ex. crying) → cognitive distortion
Irrational thought process that exaggerates the threat
Failure to respond to rational arguments (ex. most dogs are not violent)→ person knows that their fear is excessive
Two-Process Model
Proposed by Mower and suggests that phobias are acquired
States that phobias are learnt by classical conditioning and maintained by operant conditioning
Classical conditioning → if an unpleasant emotion is paired with a stimulus, then the two become associated with each other through conditioning
Operant conditioning → maintained through negative reinforcement - the phobic object is avoided and this further reinforces the phobia
Explaining Phobias - Classical Conditioning - (A)PF(C) - Little Albert Experiment (Watson and Rayner)
P - For several weeks, Albert played happily with a white rat showing no fear
One day while he was paying with the rat the experimenters struck a steel bar with a hammer close to Albert’s head which frightened him
This was repeated every time he reached for the rat
F - Little Albert then developed a fear of white rats
Explaining Phobias - Operant Conditioning
Avoidance of phobic object or situation is reinforced by the reduction of anxiety
Frequent contact with a phobic object may reveal that it is harmless, which will lead to the extinction of the phobia - however people with phobias usually go to great lengths to avoid their fears
Two-Process Theory argues that phobias are acquired through classical conditioning but maintained through operant conditioning
Explaining Phobias - Scientific AO3
Behavioural approach is scientific and its key principles can be measured in an objective way
Ex. Phobia developed by Little Albert was clear to measure - variables manipulated to ensure that phobia development was as a result of a neutral; stimulus being associated with an UR
Sue et al suggested that people with phobias do recall specific incidents when phobias appeared
This is positive because it allows concepts such as CC to be demonstrated scientifically and has resulted in a large amount of empirical support for behavioural therapies
Explaining Phobias - Deterministic AO3
Ex. Two Process Model suggests that when an individual experiences a traumatic event and uses this event to draw an association between a neutral stimulus and unconditioned response they will go on to develop a phobia
This is a weakness because this theory suggests that we are programmed by our environmental experiences and ignores individual free will
Furthermore, many people have negative or traumatic experiences that do not lead to phobias
This suggests that the behavioural approach cannot account for the different phobias
Explaining Phobias - Reductionist AO3
Two Process Model suggests that complex mental disorders such as phobias are caused solely by our experience of association, rewards and punishment
This is a problem because the approach can be seen as too simplistic as it only explains all behaviour through learning experiences (nuture) as it ignores the role of other factors, such as the role of biology (ex. genes, neurotransmitters) in the development of abnormality
Seligman argued that we are biologically prepared to learn associations between stimuli - innate fear for survival
What is the first step in the process of systematic desensitization according to Wolpe?
Clients are taught relaxation techniques.
What is the aim of teaching relaxation techniques in systematic desensitization?
To replace the fear response with relaxation.
What is created in step 2 of systematic desensitization?
A fear hierarchy.
How is the fear hierarchy structured?
It is a list of feared objects or situations ranked from least to most feared.
In step 3, what do clients do in the presence of the therapist?
They confront each item in the hierarchy while in a state of deep relaxation.
What is the process followed by clients in step 3 of systematic desensitization?
Clients start with the least feared item and move on once they feel relaxed and unafraid.
What happens in step 4 of systematic desensitization?
Clients cope with every level of the hierarchy over a series of sessions.
What flexibility do clients have in step 4 of the process?
They can stop and restart at a lower level if needed.
What indicates that systematic desensitization has been successful in step 5?
Clients have been counter conditioned and no longer associate the object or situation with fear.
What does counter conditioning mean in the context of systematic desensitization?
It means clients have learned a new response to a stimulus.
Systematic Desensitisation - Effective AO3
McGrath et al found that 75% of patients responded to SD
Also supported by Gilroy who found that at 3 months and 33 months after the treatment patients were less fearful, hence helpful in reducing anxiety for arachnophobia
This is positive because this therapy is effective at removing the symptoms of a phobia and these effects are long lasting
Systematic Desensitisation - Appropriate AO3
Suitable treatment for a diverse range of patients
Much well suited to some patients than flooding or other cognitive therapies
Some sufferers of phobias also have learning difficulties which may make it difficult for them to understand what is happening during flooding/other cognitive therapies which require reflection on what they are thinking
SD is considered to be most appropriate which is a strength because it provides a treatment for different types of patients to help them with their phobia
Systematic Desensitisation - Not effective for more complex phobias AO3
Ohman et al suggested SD might not be effective in treating anxieties that have an underlying survival component (ex. fear of heights)
This is a problem because by only focusing on the removal of symptoms rather than in identifying the underlying cause a disorder may only be removed temporarily and may reoccur at a later date - often worse than before (called symptom substitution)
What is flooding
Approach directly exposes clients to the objects or situations they fear
In theory exposing the client repeatedly to the feared stimulus will allow them to see that there is no basis for their fear
If the therapy works this leads to the extinction of the fear
How does flooding work
Exposure to phobic stimulus without gradual build up - immediate exposure to frightening situation
Stops phobic response more quickly
No avoidance behaviour tolerated - sufferers have to face fear and realise it is harmless
Extinction - learned response (CS) no longer produces conditioned response
Patients may achieve relaxation in presence of stimulus as they get exhausted by own fear response
Flooding - Cost-effective AO3
Can be achieved in one session only
Allowing patients to carry on with their own lives
Clinically effective and not expensive
More people can be treated at the same cost with flooding than with SD using a longer session
Flooding - Less effective for some types of phobia AO3
Ex. some phobias are known to be complex in nature - likely to involve cognitive factors
Ineffective for complex phobias as only targets behavioural responses
Cognitive and behavioural treatment is the most effective for complex phobias (CBT)
Flooding - Traumatic AO3
Inappropriate for patients lacking insight - issues with informed consent
Schumacher et al - participants and therapists rated flooding as significantly more stressful than SD
Unethical as it may cause harm
Also ineffective as patients may leave before treatment ends (attrition), reinforcing their phobia
Suggests that overall therapists may avoid treatment