D may be convicted of murder contrary to common law and is an indictable offence.
Definition
Defined by Lord Coke as 'the unlawfulkilling of a reasonable person in being under the King's peace with malice aforethought, express or implied'.
Actus Reus
Unlawful killing - not in selfdefence (Martin), at war or in prevention of a crime
An act - positive, voluntaryact or omission (failure to act)
Reasonable person in being - human being, not a foetus (so wholly expelled from the mother and have an independent blood circulation - Att-Gen Ref No.3) or barin-stemdead (Malcherek & Steel)
Under the King's peace - not during war
Causation
Factual - 'butfor' test (White)
Legal - de minimis 'more than a minor cause' (Kimsey), operating and substantial cause 'most to blame' (Smith)
New Intervening Acts - V's own actions (Roberts), v's self neglect (Wallace), actions of a 3rd party (Pagett), palpably wrong medical treatment (Jordan/Smith), thin skull rule (Blaue)
Mens Rea
Expressmalice aforethought
Direct intent - D has the aim, wish or desire to kill
Indirect intent - D aims to bring about a desired result, but death or serious bodily harm is a virtual certainty and the D appreciated it (Woollin)
Impliedmalice aforethought
D has the intention to cause GBH but V dies (Vickers), 'really serious harm' (DPP v Smith)
*CHECK for transferred malice*
Sentence
If both AR and MR are established, D would be guilty subject to any defence and if convicted, would face mandatory life imprisonment.