New Religious Movements have exploded since the 1960s
New Religious Movements are cults and sects only
Wallis categories New Religious Movements into three categories; World-rejecting, World-accommodating and World-affirming
World-Rejecting NRMs are similar to Troeltsch's sects
World-rejecting NRMs are high religious with a notion of God, they seek radical change and expect members to break with their former life, they are often popular amongst marginalised people
An example of a World-rejecting NRMs in Peoples Temple
World-accommodating NRMs are often breakaways from mainstream churches/dominations and they neither accept nor reject the world, they seek spirituality rather than worldly matters
An example of World-accommodating NRMs is Neo-petnacostalism
World-affirming NRMs lack the conventional features of religious, but offer their follows access to spiritual/supernatural powers. Most of them are cults and often have a middle class membership of customers
An example of world-affirming NRMs is Transcendental Meditation
However, Wallis split of NRMs into these groups may be incorrect, as often real NRMs rarely fit into one
3HO doesn't fit clearly into any of the boxes, they can be rejecting and accommodating
Stark/Bainbridge reject constructing typologies altogether, they should be split according to them by if they have tension between the religious group and wider society
Stark/Bainbridge states that Sects offer worldly benefits
Stark/Bainbridge state that cults offer this-worldly benefits