may historians conclude that there is no definitive answer to the problem but adopt one of the theodicies as the 'best fit' with their experience
the Catholic Church and many protestants adopt the soul-deciding augustinian theodicy with its emphasis on free will, judgement, heaven and hell
any others adopt the free will defence (often in conjunction with one of the other theodicies) or hick's soul-making theodicy.
some liberal christians accept process theodicy.
whatever theodicy is adopted, many christians also adopt the practical response of trying to alleviate suffering wherever they can.
many christians reject any attempt at philosophical understanding in favour of faith
they follow the example of Job, who in the end accepts that the limitations of being a human mean that he cannot understand why he suffers, but he is prepared to trust that god does have a good purpose.
despite his fear of death experienced in Gethsemane and his sense of separation from god at the height of his agony on the cross, Jesus trusted that there was a good purpose behind his death
the experience of terrible suffering, especially when it is on a colossal scale, has led to two polarising results
it is a major reason for the growth in atheism and agosticism in modern times
it is also one reason for the increase in apocalyptic and millenarian christian sects, whose literal understanding of the New Testament book of revelation leads to them understanding the ever-increasing evil on earth as the preliminaries to the final cosmic battle between god and satan that will lead to the end of the world as we know it.
apocalyptic sects
religious groups that believe the end of the world is imminent
millenarianism
the belief that there will be a thousand years' reign of christ, followed by universal resurrection, judgement and consignment to heaven or hell