Government efforts to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor by expanding social welfare programs
Welfare states have widened social inequality
Countries with good economies and more equal societies
Japan
Sweden
Finland
Norway
Wilkinson and Pickett's argument
Aspects of a society are not defined by its wealth but by the gap between the rich and poor. The larger the gap, the more poorly it will score on measures like educational performance, crime rates, health, and social mobility.
Government view of inequality
Governments don't see inequality as a problem itself, but rather don't want it to be extreme. Governments have a duty to ensure the living standards of the poorest are not too low.
Reasons for introduction and continuation of welfare states
1. Moral - it is not seen as acceptable for some to be well-off while others are in poverty
2. Political - to prevent the working class from rebelling against injustice and inequality, and to win support and votes from particular groups by giving them benefits
3. Functionalist - welfare benefits maintain society's values and prevent it from becoming dysfunctional
Welfare states in Scandinavian countries
They provide more benefits, paid for by higher taxes on higher income earners, resulting in relatively low levels of inequality
In Europe, welfare states have often expanded through democratic parties in order to decrease class struggle and allow redistribution of wealth
In the USA, the value of individualism encourages people to work and look after themselves, which has apparently been more successful than the European approach
Right-wing view of welfare states
They have become too expensive and encourage a 'dependency culture' where people lose the ability to take care of themselves
Right-wing criticisms of welfare states
Encouraging dependency culture
Being open to abuse with people fraudulently receiving benefits
Becoming too expensive as more people receive benefits instead of only those who need them
Discouraging the unemployed from looking for jobs
Making the state a 'nanny state' that provides more than is needed
Risking the production of an 'underclass' whose values and norms are separate from the rest of society
Marxist and left-wing view of welfare states
Welfare states are a 'bribery' to prevent revolution from less fortunate people, softening the harsh economic realities of capitalism
Government efforts to reduce inequality
Progressive taxation
Equal opportunities legislation
Providing state education
Setting minimum wages
Groups most likely to be poor
Lone parents and their children
Long-term unemployed people
Low-paid workers
Refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants
People dependent on welfare benefits
Chronically ill or disabled people
Absolute poverty
Lacking basic necessities such as food, water, sanitation, shelter, health, education, and information
Relative poverty
Being poor according to the social context and standards of the society you live in
One way of calculating poverty is 60% of median income
Another way is calculating the total cost of necessities, as used by Peter Townsend in his studies on UK poverty, which found that 20% of the UK was in poverty
Main reasons for poverty
Welfare benefits that still leave people below the povertyline
Low-paid jobs
No paid job
Cycle of poverty
Families staying in poverty for three generations because the factors causing it do not change and instead perpetuate it
Poverty trap
Being poor is expensive, as people have to spend a lot on essential standard of living (e.g. unable to travel to cheap shops, unable to insulate homes, buying old/second-hand goods, unable to borrow at low interest rates)
Culture of poverty
The idea that poor people have a set of values that keep them in poverty (e.g. low literacy and education, fatalism, feeling marginalised, not using resources, needing immediate gratification)
Research has shown that the poor have the same values as the rest of society, and the 'culture of poverty' is sometimes used by politicians as an excuse not to tackle poverty
Social exclusion
Systematically excluding people from rights, opportunities and resources that are available to others (e.g. housing, employment, health, transport)
To tackle social exclusion, the government needs to find ways to involve socially excluded people more in society, not just provide welfare benefits
Functionalist view of poverty
Sees it as a positive aspect for the functioning of society, as it rewards those with natural abilities and creates workers for undesirable jobs, while increasing social solidarity through charity
Marxist view of poverty
Sees it as an inevitable consequence of capitalism, where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, as capitalists pay the working class as little as possible
Right-wing view of poverty
Blames the poor for being poor, seeing it as a cultural problem rather than a social construction
Feminist view of poverty
Emphasises female poverty, as women are more likely to be paid less than men and have fewer job opportunities
The world's poorest people face risks like living in areas exposed to flooding and pollution, having temporary homes, being affected first by climate change, and having limited access to health, education and other services
Women have a tripleburden of work - they work for an income, do domestic labour, and take care of children
In most countries women earn far less than men even for the same work
Women experience violence including domestic violence and female genital mutilation
In some countries the preference for boy children has led to the abortion of female foetuses, leading to an imbalance in the population
Girls are less likely to go to school than boys in many developing countries
Girls are more likely than boys to marry young, which often ends their education and may lead to health problems if there is an early pregnancy
Women are more likely to be in poverty than men
Women live longer on average, about 5 years longer than men in most societies
Changing role of women in modern industrial societies
Women now play a greaterpart in the workforce
The traditional female gender role of housewife and mother has not disappeared but is now more likely to be combined with paidwork
Men have often taken on a greater share of housework and childcare to accommodate this
Women still face discrimination in employment - they are more likely than men to work part time, and time away from work when children are born and while the children are young can affect their opportunities for promotion