Subdecks (1)

    Cards (15)

    • Procedure:
      • Compared split brain patients to others with no hemisphere separation.
      • Different activities where tried witht he patients including touch of objects and visual presentation of stimuli to see how the different sides perform on tasks.

      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Visual tasks
      • A word or picture is projected into the left or right visual field and patient will be asked something about that stimuli.
      Tactile tasks
      • Were carried out with ppts hands underneath a screen so the ppts could not see what they were touching.
      • The had to use ‘feel’ only.
      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Independant variable - Cut corpus callosum or uncut corpus callosum.

      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Dependant variable - how the ppt behaved.

      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Findings:
      • Left visual field, left hand.
      • They could select the object because it was seen by the right hemisphere.
      • They could not speak about the object.

      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Findings - recognition by touch:
      • Left visual field, right hand.
      • If the left hand picked up the right hands object, it would be rejected.
      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Conclusions:
      • Hemispheres of the brain process information separately.
      • Hemispheres do have different functions supporting lateralisation.
      • Two separate streams of consciousness with their own memories and perceptions.

      Key study - Sperry (1968)
    • Findings - Composite words:
      • If two words were presented simultaneously, one on either side of the visual field.
      • The patient would say one word but write the other with their left hand.
      • This is because the left hand is controlled by the right hemisphere, collecting information from the left visual field.

      Key study - Sperry (1968)