Menstrual synchrony, of the kind observed in the McClintock study, is thought to have an evolutionary value. It may have been advantageous for females to menstruate together and therefore fall pregnant around the same time, as new-borns could be cared for collectively within a social group, increasing the chances of its survival. However, the validity of the evolutionary perspective has been questioned. Schank (2004) argued that if their were too many females cycling together, this would produce competition for the highest quality males (and thereby lowering the fitness of any potential offspring).