Samah

    Subdecks (2)

    Cards (406)

    • Quality Control
      Lecture 4: Theorems of Probability
    • Theorems of Probability
      Example 6
    • Example 6
      1. Assume that in Example Problem of Example 5, the first part was not returned to the box before the second part was selected
      2. What is the probability?
    • Probabilities to calculate
      • Probability of choosing both parts from supplier Z
      • Probability of choosing both nonconforming parts
      • Probability of choosing both conforming parts
      • Probability of choosing both conforming parts from supplier X
    • Tutorial
      Example (Homework)
    • Distribution of marks obtained by 1200 students
      • Below 40
      • Above 80
      • Between 40 and 100
    • Example 7
      If the 261 parts described in Table 5-1 are contained in a box, what is the probability that two randomly selected parts (with replacement) will have one conforming part from supplier X and one conforming part from supplier Y or supplier Z?
    • Example 8
      An oil company is bidding for the rights to drill a well in field A and a well in field B
    • Probabilities to calculate
      • Probability of a successful well in field A
      • Probability of a successful well in field B
      • Probability of both a successful well in field A and a successful well in field B
      • Probability of at least one successful well in the two fields together
      • Probability of no successful well in field A
      • Probability of no successful well in field B
      • Probability of no successful well in the two fields together (calculate by two methods)
      • Probability of exactly one successful well in the two fields together
    • bago pa man = before
    • tulad niya = like him/her
    • sa kabila ng lahat = despite everything
    • kung saan man = wherever
    • Process control
      Monitoring during the production process
    • Acceptance sampling procedure
      Inspection before and after production
    • Lot-by-lot acceptance sampling by attributes
      Most common type of sampling
    • Lot-by-lot acceptance sampling by attributes
      1. Predetermined number of units (sample) from each lot inspected by attributes
      2. If number of nonconforming units less than prescribed minimum, lot accepted; if not, lot not accepted
    • Acceptance sampling

      Can be used for number of nonconforming units or nonconformities per unit
    • Lot-by-lot acceptance sampling by attributes
      • Lot size, N = 9000
      • Sample size, n = 300
      • Acceptance number, c = 2
    • Situations where acceptance sampling is most likely to be used
      • When test is destructive, sampling necessary
      • Cost of 100% inspection high relative to cost of passing nonconforming unit
      • Many similar units to be inspected, fatigue and boredom cause higher percentage of nonconforming material to be passed
      • Information on producer's quality not available
      • Automated inspection not available
    • Lot formation
      • Lots should be homogeneous
      • Lots should be as large as possible
    • Representative sample
      Sample units selected for inspection should be representative of the entire lot - random sampling
    • Courses of action for non-accepted lots
      • Passed to production facilities, non-conforming units sorted by production personnel
      • Rectified at consumer's plant by personnel from producer's or consumer's plant
      • Returned to producer for rectification
    • Single sampling
      One sample taken from lot, decision to accept or not accept based on inspection results of that sample
    • Double sampling
      Initial sample, decision based on inspection results whether to accept lot, not accept lot, or take another sample<|>If quality very good, lot accepted on first sample and second sample not taken<|>If quality very poor, lot not accepted on first sample and second sample not taken<|>Only when quality level neither very good nor very bad is second sample taken
    • Multiple sampling
      Continuation of double sampling, three, four, five or more samples can be established, sample sizes much smaller
    • Sequential sampling
      Items sampled and inspected one after another, cumulative record maintained, decision made to accept or not accept lot as soon as sufficient cumulative evidence
    • All four types of sampling plans can give the same results, type of plan based on factors other than effectiveness
    • Factors determining type of sampling plan

      • Simplicity
      • Administrative costs
      • Quality information
      • Number of units inspected
      • Psychological impact
    • Process Capability
      The natural variation of a process should be small enough to produce products that meet the standards required. A process in statistical control does not necessarily meet the design specifications.
    • Process capability
      A measure of the relationship between the natural variation of the process and the design specifications
    • Control limits are established as a function of the average

      Specification is the permissible variation in the size of the part and for individual values and established by design engineers, at this time, to obtain a better understanding of individual values and average values
    • Figure (1) shows that there are a large number of individual values and subgroup averages
    • Both distributions (individual values and subgroup averages) are normal in shape
    • The control limits, process spread, distribution of individual values are interdependent
    • Control charts cannot determine whether the process is meeting specification
    • Process spread
      Process capability, equal to
    • Tolerance
      The difference between specifications
    • When the tolerance is established by the design engineer without regard to the spread of the process, undesirable situations can result
    • Case I: When the process capability is less than the tolerance 6σ<USL-LSL

      1. Process is in control
      2. No difficulty encountered even when there is a substantial shift in the process mean
    See similar decks