High control of variables (independent and extraneous)
Measurement of outcomes (dependent variables)
Standardised procedures – can replicate and check reliability
Objective data (quantitative) and objectivetechniques (scanners, biological tests etc.)
Establishing cause and effect (lab experiments)
For
Attempts to control variables and outcomes
Research is standardised so can be replicated
Some areas like the use of objective data collection techniques which reduces bias
Against
Extraneous variables will always influence human behaviour
Bias can influence interpretation of results
What makes something a science
Controlled, experimental conditions that can show cause and effect and can test hypotheses.
Highly standardised experiments that can be repeated in the same way - reliability
Use of IVs and DVs.
The scientific method – objective, systematic and replicable.
The scientific cycle – objective, systematic and replicable observation. Building, refining or falsifying, development of a scientific theory, constant testing/refining and back to the theory.
For psychology as a science
It relies on objective and systematic methods, so is more than the passive acceptance of facts.
Because scientific methods rely on a belief in determinism, they are able to establish causes through use of methods that are empirical and replicable.
If scientific theories no longer fit the facts, they can be refined/abandoned. Psychologists are always replicating each other’s work so poor theories become redundant quickly.
Against psychology as a science
It concentrates so much on objectivity and control that it tells us little about how people act in more natural environments.
Much of the subject matter in psychology is unobservable, so cannot be measured with any degree of accuracy.
Not all psychologists share the view that all human behaviour can be explored using scientific methods.