Types of Experiment

Cards (12)

  • Laboratory experiments

    Experiments conducted in a lab, a highly controlled environment; advantage of being easily controlled
  • Strengths of laboratory experiments
    - High internal validity; allow for the precise control of variables.
    - IV is manipulated so allows cause-effect relationships (causality) to be established.
    - Easier to replicate; so other researchers can see if they obtain similar results (good reliability).
    - Use of technical apparatus which cannot be used in more natural settings to take accurate measurement, objective and scientific.
  • Limitations of laboratory experiments
    - Low ecological validity/mundane realism - has been conducted in an artificial environment which may produce unnatural behaviour that does not reflect real life.
    - This means the results cannot be generalised to real life.
    - Demand characteristics/experimenter effects may affect the results and become confounding variables.
  • Field experiments
    Experiments conducted in natural settings rather than in the laboratory
  • Strengths of field experiments
    - Participants are more likely to behave in a typical way, less risk of demand characteristics.
    - Higher ecological validity as in natural setting.
  • Limitations of field experiments
    - Low internal validity; risk of confounding variables.
    - Easier to collect large amounts of data in a Lab.
    - Not possible to carry out certain types of studies in field because bulky equipment would give the game away.
    - Ethical issues; consent.
    - Causality cannot be established due to uncontrollable extraneous variables.
  • Natural experiments
    Naturally occurring events or phenomena having somewhat different conditions that can be compared with almost as much rigor as in experiments where the investigator manipulates the conditions.
  • Strengths of natural experiments
    - Allows study of the effects of an independent variable that may be difficult or unethical to manipulate.
    - May have good practical applications in the real world.
  • Limitations of natural experiments
    - Can't be precisely replicated.
    - Naturally occurring event may happen rarely and limit generalisation of findings to similar situations.
  • Quasi-experiments
    Comparisons of groups that differ in exposure to a variable of interest that cannot be manipulated for ethical or practical reasons
  • Strengths of quasi-experiments
    Allows study of an independent variable that cannot be manipulated and may well have good practical applications in the real world.
  • Limitations of quasi-experiments
    Can't randomly allocate Ps to conditions and therefore there may be a confounding variable.