Types of Experiment

    Cards (12)

    • Laboratory experiments

      Experiments conducted in a lab, a highly controlled environment; advantage of being easily controlled
    • Strengths of laboratory experiments
      - High internal validity; allow for the precise control of variables.
      - IV is manipulated so allows cause-effect relationships (causality) to be established.
      - Easier to replicate; so other researchers can see if they obtain similar results (good reliability).
      - Use of technical apparatus which cannot be used in more natural settings to take accurate measurement, objective and scientific.
    • Limitations of laboratory experiments
      - Low ecological validity/mundane realism - has been conducted in an artificial environment which may produce unnatural behaviour that does not reflect real life.
      - This means the results cannot be generalised to real life.
      - Demand characteristics/experimenter effects may affect the results and become confounding variables.
    • Field experiments
      Experiments conducted in natural settings rather than in the laboratory
    • Strengths of field experiments
      - Participants are more likely to behave in a typical way, less risk of demand characteristics.
      - Higher ecological validity as in natural setting.
    • Limitations of field experiments
      - Low internal validity; risk of confounding variables.
      - Easier to collect large amounts of data in a Lab.
      - Not possible to carry out certain types of studies in field because bulky equipment would give the game away.
      - Ethical issues; consent.
      - Causality cannot be established due to uncontrollable extraneous variables.
    • Natural experiments
      Naturally occurring events or phenomena having somewhat different conditions that can be compared with almost as much rigor as in experiments where the investigator manipulates the conditions.
    • Strengths of natural experiments
      - Allows study of the effects of an independent variable that may be difficult or unethical to manipulate.
      - May have good practical applications in the real world.
    • Limitations of natural experiments
      - Can't be precisely replicated.
      - Naturally occurring event may happen rarely and limit generalisation of findings to similar situations.
    • Quasi-experiments
      Comparisons of groups that differ in exposure to a variable of interest that cannot be manipulated for ethical or practical reasons
    • Strengths of quasi-experiments
      Allows study of an independent variable that cannot be manipulated and may well have good practical applications in the real world.
    • Limitations of quasi-experiments
      Can't randomly allocate Ps to conditions and therefore there may be a confounding variable.
    See similar decks