Evaluative standards for measuring employees’ success or failure (typically performance-related in I/O)
Criteria
All aspects of performance that define success on a job, the theoretical construct that we develop as guide or goal to shoot for in measuring performance success
Ultimate Criterion
Our best real-world representation of the ultimate criterion and what we use in reality
Actual Criterion
Degree to which actual criterion relates to ultimate criterion (the overlap)
Relevance
Stuff in the ultimate measure not included in actual measure
Criterion Deficiency
Stuff measured by actual criterion that is not part of the ultimate measure
Criterion Contamination
Degree to which individual can perform job tasks central to a specific job
Job-specific Task Proficiency
Consistency and persistence in an individual’s work effort
Demonstrating Effort
No substance abuse
Maintaining Personal Discipline
Equally weight different criteria (2) Weight criteria based on importance, weight criteria differently based on decision being made
Composite Criterion
Performance levels change over time
Dynamic Criteria
Hard, nonjudgmental criteria taken from organizational records not supposed to involve any subjective judgments
Objective Criteria
Soft, judgmental criteria that measures based on rankings/ratings or evaluations of others rather than on counting objective constructs