Allowing some individuals more opportunities than others to reproduce<|>Choice of individuals to become parents for the next generation of offspring
Selection remains the only means of directing genetic improvement in closed populations
Response to selection
Result or progress of a selection programme
Response to selection is of interest because of genetic change expected in the population
Selection of desirable genes
Increases their frequency - more homozygous individuals will be selected
Two interests of selection
Increase frequency of desirable genes
Change mean value of herd/population
Traits
Reproductive: h^2 < 0.2 (low)
Growth: h^2 0.2 - 0.4 (moderate)
Carcass quality: h^2 0.4 - 0.6 (high)
Few traits have h^2 > 0.6
Heritability (h^2)
Proportion of phenotypic variation that is due to additive gene effects
Generally moderate to highly heritable traits respond positively to selection
Response to selection
1. R = h^2 x S
2. Where R is the response, h^2 is the heritability, S is the selection differential
Selection differential (S)
Deviation of mean of selected parents from population mean
Standardized selection differential
1. R = i x h^2 x δP
2. Where R is the response, i is the intensity of selection, h^2 is the heritability, δP is the phenotypic standard deviation
Standardized selection differentials for different proportions saved
90% saved: i = 0.20
80% saved: i = 0.35
70% saved: i = 0.50
etc...
Standardized selection differentials
70% saved: i = 0.50, S = 1.6
20% saved: i = 1.40, S = 2.8
etc...
Within generation change
Difference between mean of selected parents (μS) and population mean before selection (μO)
Between generation change
Difference between population mean after selection (μP) and population mean before selection (μO)
Response to selection (R) is the average deviation of offspring mean from population mean = breeding value of parents
Realized heritability
h^2 = Response/Selection Differential
Response to selection for average daily gain in beef cattle calves
h^2 = 0.4, Herd mean = 1.0 kg/day, Mean of selected parents = 1.2 kg/day, Response = 0.08 kg/day per generation
Response to selection for ovulation rate in sheep
h^2 = 0.1, Herd mean = 6 ovulating follicles per ewe, Mean of selected parents = 9, Response = 0.3 ovulating follicles per generation
Response to selection will eventually diminish when all favourable alleles at most loci become fixed in the homozygous type
In livestock breeding, new genetic materials are constantly being introduced from outside the herd and this will maintain genetic variability in a herd
Ways to increase response to selection
1. More intense selection (keeping smaller proportion of animals as parents)
2. Higher heritability estimates (making environment more uniform to all animals)
3. Increase phenotypic variation (introducing new genetic materials)
Response to selection for back-fat thickness in pigs
h^2 = 0.5, Herd mean = 28 mm, Mean of male parents = 20 mm, Mean of female parents = 28 mm, Response = -1.75 mm per generation
Response to selection for weaning weight in beef cattle
h^2 = 0.30, % saved (males) = 5%, % saved (females) = 30%, Response = 9.66 kg per generation
Correlated response
Response on another trait (Trait Y) when selecting directly for a particular trait (Trait X), exists only when there is genetic correlation between the two traits
Correlated response
CR_Y = i h_X r_A δ_AY = i h_X h_Y r_A δ_PY
Correlated response in average daily gain when selecting for weaning weight in beef cattle
Improve Trait X by selecting indirectly for Trait Y (secondary trait)
Efficiency of indirect selection
CR_X / R_X = r_A * (i_Y * h_Y) / (i_X * h_X)
Indirect selection can be more efficient than direct selection if the secondary trait has higher heritability, higher selection intensity, and high genetic correlation with the primary trait
Usefulness of correlated response
Select indirectly for a secondary trait to improve the primary trait when the primary trait is difficult to measure, measurable only in one sex, or very costly to measure
Correlated response for feed efficiency = -0.5974 kg feed/kg gain/generation (when direct selection is for average daily gain)
Direct selection for feed efficiency = 0.7513 kg feed/kg gain/generation (has to be interpreted as a negative value since lower feed efficiency is better)
Response to selection
R = h^2 x S
Where R is the response, h^2 is the heritability, S is the selection differential