Assessment in which the actual student performance is assessed through a product, such as a completed project or work that demonstrates levels of task achievement
Authentic assessment
Alternative assessment that is performance-based
Product-oriented assessment
Assessment where the assessor views and scores the final product made and not on the actual performance of making that product
Product-oriented assessment
More concerned with the outcome or the performance of the learner
Focuses on the achievement of the learner
Product assessment
Focuses on evaluating the result or outcome of a process
Product-oriented learning competencies
Novice or beginner's level
Skilled level
Expert level
Product-oriented learning competencies - Typing class
Possess no more than five (5) errors in spelling - (minimum specifications)
Possess no more than 5 errors in spelling while observing proper format based on the document to be typewritten - (skilled level)
Possess no more than 5 errors in spelling, has the proper format, and is readable and presentable - (expert level)
Task designing for product-oriented assessment
Complexity - level of complexity within the range of student ability
Appeal - project/activity must be interesting and encourage self-discovery
Creativity - project must encourage creativity and divergent thinking
Goal-based - project is produced to attain a learning objective
Scoring rubrics
Descriptive scoring schemes developed by teachers or evaluators to guide the analysis of student products or processes
Scoring rubrics
Increase objectivity and inter-rater reliability in assessment
Provide feedback to students on how to improve performance
Criteria for scoring rubrics
Quality
Creativity
Comprehensiveness
Accuracy
Aesthetic
Holistic scoring rubric
Each score category describes the characteristics of a response that would receive that score
Scoring rubrics are appropriate for evaluating group activities, extended projects, oral presentations, and across disciplines
Checklists
Enumerate a set of desirable characteristics and the teacher marks those observed
General vs task-specific scoring rubrics
General rubrics can be used to evaluate a sequence of similar tasks, while task-specific rubrics are needed to evaluate unique tasks
Bloom's Taxonomy
Created in 1956 to promote higher forms of thinking in education, learning takes place in 3 domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor
Affective Domain
Describes learning objectives that emphasize a feeling tone, an emotion, or a degree of acceptance or rejection
Why assess Affective Domain
Affective assessment is based on students' attitudes, interests and values
Assessing the affective domain is important as it is often overlooked despite its importance
Taxonomy in the Affective Domain
Receiving
Responding
Valuing
Organization
Characterization by value or value set
Development of Assessment Tools
Self Report
Tally Sheet
Thurstone Scale
The affective domain is part of Bloom's taxonomy published in 1965, along with the cognitive and psychomotor domains
The affective domain describes learning objectives that emphasize a feeling tone, an emotion, or a degree of acceptance or rejection
Much of the educative process needs to deal with assessment and measurement of students' abilities in the affective domain
The development of the psychomotor domain is also an important consideration in education, but is not covered in this chapter
Some students characterize themselves as environmentalists, geology majors or earth scientists
Importance of mentioning and studying biographies of great scientists
They serve as inspiration for students to emulate the way that great scientists have led simple lives and devoted their talents to the cause of science
Affective topics in educational literature
Attitudes, motivation, communication styles, classroom management styles, learning styles, use of technology in the classroom and nonverbal communication, interests, predisposition and self-efficacy
The affective domain is the least studied and most often overlooked domain in educational literature despite the fact that almost every researcher or author begins with a premise on the importance of the affective domain in the teaching-learning process
Reason for affective domain being overlooked
It is the most nebulous and the hardest to evaluate among Bloom's three domains
Traditional assessment procedures concentrate on the cognitive aspects of learning and teachers typically focus their efforts on the development of tests and instruments for measuring cognitive learning
By tapping the potentials of the affective domain in enhancing learning, we increase the likelihood of real and authentic learning among our students
Students may experience affective roadblocks to learning that can neither be recognized nor solved when using a purely cognitive approach
Not to restrict spontaneity or constraint the vision of education in the discipline; but to ensure that learning is focused clearly enough that both students and teacher know what is going on, and so learning can be objectively measured
Levels of the Taxonomy in the Affective Domain
Receiving
Responding
Valuing
Organization
Characterization by Value
Attitudes
A mental predisposition to act that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favor or disfavor
Components of attitudes
Cognitions
Affect
Behavioral Intentions
Evaluation
Attitudes can influence the way we act and think in the social communities we belong
Motivation
A reason or set or reasons for engaging in a particular behavior, especially human behavior as studied in psychology and neuropsychology
Maslow's hierarchy of human needs theory
Human beings have wants and desires which influence their behavior; only unsatisfied needs can influence behavior, satisfied needs cannot
The person advances to the next level of needs only after the lower level need is at least minimally satisfied
The further the progress up the hierarchy, the more individuality, humanness and psychological health a person will show