Inducing change via professional relationship, Solve or prevent problems, Achieve latent potential
Psychotherapy
Treatment for emotional problems, Affect changes in the individual (e.g., reduce symptoms), Professionally established relationship
Efficacy
Person receiving treatment must show significant reduction in the levels of dysfunction, Focus on internal validity
Effectiveness
Treatment option must be representative, Emphasize external validity
Effect size
Change relative to a comparison group that does not receive the treatment
Types of studies
Efficacy studies
Effectiveness studies
1995 study done by Consumer Reports magazine summarized the survey responses of 4,000 readers who had sought treatment for a psychological problem
Most respondents well educated, median age = 46, half women
Majority reported some improvement, Those who felt the worst before treatment reported the most improvement, All types of mental health professionals appeared to be equally effective, Respondents who received psychotherapy alone improved as much as those who received psychotherapy plus medication, Longer treatment (more sessions) was related to more improvement
Evidence Based Treatments (EBTs)
Question of efficacy vs. other treatments, EBTs have produced significant change in trials, APA established criteria for EBTs in 1995, Combine trials of EBTs through use of meta-analysis
Evidence BasedPractice (EBP)
Broader, contains non controlled trials (i.e., no control or comparison group), Question of whether one can scientifically measure effect without a comparison group, Rise in use with healthcare reforms
Common factors
3 Types: supportive, learning, action, Involved in all effective psychotherapies
Therapeutic alliance
Relation between client/ therapist, Unique in importance, Not necessarily curative, Must be non-judgmental, objective, insightful, professional
Expert role
Expert knowledge about psychological problems, Competency/ training, Maintaining equal respect
Building competency
Therapist as educator, Promote self-efficacy, Facilitate mastery experiences, Influence of immeasurables: hope, belief, "Placebo effect" of therapist
Patient/ client variables
Degree of distress
Intelligence
Age
Motivation (voluntary)
Openness
Gender
Race, ethnicity, social class
Reactions to patient
Therapist variables
Age, sex, ethnicity
Personality
Empathy, warmness, genuineness
Emotional well-being
Experience
Professionals vs. Paraprofessionals
Course of clinical intervention
1. Initial contact
2. Assessment
3. Goals of treatment established
4. Implementing treatment
5. Termination, evaluation, follow up
Stages of change
Pre-contemplation
Contemplation
Preparation
Action
Maintenance
Termination
Groups in psychotherapy research
Experimental: receive treatment
Control: do not receive treatment
Waiting list control: treatment delayed until after study
Attention only control: meet with clinician, but no "active" treatment given
Assessment of patient functioning conducted in parallel fashion for experimental and control groups, Before and after study
Sample: Is it representative?, Patient variables that may influence outcome, Outcome measures: Identical for every patient?, Nature of the study
Behavior therapy (BT) and psychodynamic therapy (PT) better at termination and follow-up compared to waiting list control
Meta-analysis by Smith, Glass, & Miller (1977) of 475 studies, 25,000 patients, 78 therapies, average of 16 sessions
Competence & adherence tied to positive outcome, Client emotionally processing session material tied to outcome, Degree of cooperation and positive affect in session positively tied to outcome
Recent trends: Focus of psychotherapy research on efficacy & effectiveness, Factors related to higher efficacy and effectiveness, Practice guidelines recommend specific form of treatment for specific problems, Common goal to achieve effective treatment
Manualized Treatment
Prescribed treatment method, Encourage innovation, Therapeutic alliance, Managed care