Damage

• Barnett V Chelsea


  'but for' test
• The Wagon Mound


  test for remoteness of damage, injury or damage must be reasonably foreseeable
• Hughes V Lord Advocate


  D liable if injury is reasonably foreseeable even if precise way it happened is not
• Bradford V Robinson Rentals 


  The precise extent of the harm need not be foreseeable, as long as the type of harm is foreseeable
• Doughty V Turner Asbestos


  Not foreseeable if consequence not known
• Smith V Leech brain


  Think skull rule - treat your victim as you find them