Save
...
defences
mental capacity defences
insanity
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Brooke Lennox
Visit profile
Cards (13)
M'Naghten
sets out the
3
elements
a
defect
of reason
which must be the result of a
disease
of the
mind
causing the D not to know the
nature
and
quality
of their act or not to know they were doing
wrong
Clarke
(defect of reason)
absentmindedness
or confusion are not sufficient
R v
Sullivan
(defect of reason)
the defect of reason may be permanent or temporary
Kemp
(disease of the mind)
disease
of the mind is a legal term NOT a
medical
one
Sullivan
(disease of the mind)
insanity included any
organic
functional
disease
Hennessy
(disease of the mind)
if the disease affects the
mind
then it is within the definition of
insanity
Burgess
(disease of the mind)
must be caused by an
internal
factor
Quick
(disease of the mind)
if caused by
external
factor it's
automatism
Coley
intoxicating substance is an
external
factor
R v
Oye
(not knowing the nature and quality of the act)
D mustn't know the
nature
and
quality
of act
Windle
(not knowing the nature and quality of the act)
the defendants must prove they did not know what they were doing was
legally wrong
R v
Johnson
(not knowing the nature and quality of the act)
D must not know the actions were
legally wrong
caused by
internal
factors