Keynesian model fundamentally disagreed with the classical model and its assumptions
Especially the short run long run difference which Keynes said is complete rubbish and doesn't exist in the real economy
Wages
Keynes said the assumption of wages being variable in the long term is a crazy assumption
Keynesian aggregate supply
Not different in the short run and long run
Determined by the level of spare capacity in the economy
There is a Full Employment level of output which represents the maximum use of all factors of production in the economy at sustainable levels
Keynesian aggregate supply curve
Can be horizontal as well as vertical
Horizontal Keynesian aggregate supply curve
Represents a point in time where there is so much spare capacity in a recession, where output can increase without any inflationary pressure
Keynesian disagreements with the classical model
Notion of short run and long run
Wages changing in the long run and becoming variable
Belief that the economy will self-heal
Keynesian view on wages
Wages are sticky going downwards, workers are very resistant to pay cuts
Waiting for wages to adjust downwards in the long run
We'll all be dead by the time that happens
Deflationary or recessionary gap
In the Keynesian model, this could well be a long run equilibrium because wages don't adjust
Keynesian solution
1. Active demand side management in the economy
2. Policies to increase aggregate demand to move the economy closer to full employment
3. Use active fiscal policy - increase government spending, reduce taxes
Politicians liked the Keynesian theory because it promoted a greater role for government, and meant they could increase AD without much inflationary pressure
The Keynesian theory became quite successful and popular during the Great Depression for these reasons