8.2

Cards (24)

  • conformity occurs in situations in which individuals change their behaviour as a result of real or implied pressure from others
  • normative influence - our likelihood to conform is influenced by the establihshed behvaiour of the group
  • informational influence - we look at the behaviour of others to guide us in whether we should behave in similar ways
  • unanimity - we are more likely to conform when other members of gorup behave the same way
  • group size - our conformity increases as the group expands from 2 to 4 then stays at similar levels of conformity in a group of 8
  • deindividuation - when we are in a large group, our behaviour can be influenced by a sense of anonymity, and this can lead us to behave in a way that we never would have alone
  • groupthink occurs when the members of a group prioritise the strong bonds of the group over clear decision making
  • invulnerability - feeling unable to feel harmed
  • rationale - rationalising reasons for a course of action
  • morality - distinguishing between right or wrong
  • stereotypes - applying widely helf views about group
  • pressure - using persuasion and coercion
  • self censorship - remaining quiet to avoid criticism
  • unanimity - expecting agreement by all group members
  • mind guards - filtering out negative infmoration
  • preventing group think - leader not sharing opinion about topic before the groupwork starts
  • preventing group think - group inviting experts to attend meetings and critically evaluate the groups work
  • group shift is the tendency for group members discussing an issue or dilemma to adopt a more extreme position than their indiviual position before the discussion
  • risky shift - group demonstrates less caution than the individual members would have if acting alone
  • catious shift - group suggests an even safer approach than an individual would have if acting alone
  • causes of group shift -groups tend to make more extreme decisions than individuals
    • social comparison theory
    • persuasive argument theory
    • social decision schemas
  • social comparison theory proposes that the tendency to evaluate or compare oursleves to other influences our self-image and wellbeing
  • persuasiv argument theory proposes that when a group disucsses a moral dillemma, members will offer a number of arguments for and against.
    • if they favour a certain approach, the number of arguments they offer that support that approach will outweigh the number of arguments against that approach
  • social decision schemas are strategies used by groups to select one approach from various approach options
    • majority vote