1 Epistemology

Cards (12)

    • Branch of philosophy that studies knowledge, also known as theory of knowledge and aims to understand
    • what knowledge is
    • how it arises
    • what its limits are
    • what value it has.
    • Further examines the nature of truth, belief, justification, and rationality.
    • Some of the questions addressed by epistemologists include:
    • "By what method(s) can one acquire knowledge?"
    • "How is truth established?"
    • "Can we prove causal relations?”
    • Primarily interested in declarative knowledge or knowledge of facts.
    • Also investigates:
    • practical knowledge
    • such as knowing how to ride a bicycle
    • knowledge by acquaintance
    • for example, knowing a celebrity personally.
    • One area in epistemology is the analysis of knowledge.
    • Assumes that declarative knowledge is a combination of different parts and attempts to identify what those parts are.
    • An influential theory in this area claims that knowledge has three components:
    • it is a belief
    • that is justified
    • and true.
    • This theory is controversial and the difficulties associated with it are known as the Gettier problem.
    • Alternative views state:
    • that knowledge requires additional components, like the absence of luck.
    • Different components, like the manifestation of cognitive virtues instead of justification.
    • Or deny that knowledge can be analyzed in terms of other phenomena
    • Another area in epistemology asks how people acquire knowledge.
    • Often-discussed sources of knowledge are:
    • perception
    • introspection
    • memory
    • inference
    • testimony
    • According to empiricists:
    • all knowledge is based on some form of experience.
    • Rationalists:
    • Rationalists reject this view and hold that some forms of knowledge, like innate knowledge, are not acquired through experience.
    • The regress problem is a common issue in relation to the sources of knowledge and the justification they offer.
    • It is based on the idea that beliefs require some kind of reason or evidence to be justified.
    • The problem is that the source of justification may itself be in need of another source of justification.
    • This leads to an infinite regress or circular reasoning
    • Foundationalists avoid need to justify justifications, or circular reasoning, by arguing that some sources can provide justification without requiring justification themselves
    • Another solution is presented by coherentists, who state that a belief is justified if it coheres with other beliefs of the person.
    • Many discussions in epistemology touch on the topic of philosophical skepticism, which raises doubts about some or all claims to knowledge.
    • These doubts are often based on the idea that knowledge requires absolute certainty and that humans are unable to acquire it.