A framework to understand how individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviours are influenced by the people around them (Kelman, 1958)
Main processes of social influence
Compliance
Identification
Internalisation
Social influence
The process by which an individual’s attitudes, beliefs or behavior are modified by the real or implied presence and/or actions of others
Compliance
The first and “weakest” form of social influence where a person agrees in public but privately disagrees
Compliance
Temporary change of external views
Superficial influence
Perceived rewards or punishments
Identification
When an individual accepts influence to establish or maintain a desired relationship with a person or group they admire
Identification
Change of thoughts, feelings, and behaviours out of admiration
Influence disappears if the relationship is not beneficial
Internalisation
When an individual adopts influence because they believe it is intrinsically rewarding
Internalisation
Change coincides with value system
Change is considered useful
Change fulfills a need
Kelman’s framework allows researchers and practitioners to better understand social influence
Kelman's theory has been applied to a wide range of contexts, including political and social issues
Workplace setting
Compliance: An employee follows a dress code
Identification: A new hire adopts work habits of a senior employee
Internalisation: An employee internalizes the company's values
Obedience
A type of social influence where an individual changes behavior in response to a direct order by an authority figure
Obedience
Occurs on a hierarchical level
Avoidance of punishment
Trust in authority figure
Factors affecting conformity
Normative influence
Informational influence
Culture
Group size
Unanimity
Deindividuation
Social loafing
Milgram’s study on obedience was pivotal in driving later psychological studies on obedience
Milgram's study
Standardised procedure
Ethical issues
Milgram used a standardised procedure which meant it could be easily replicated by others
His experiments are also remembered for their ethical issues, which contributed to changes in regulation for experiments performed today
Ethical issues - Milgram Study
Participants did not give informed consent
Deception
Violation of withdrawal rights
Psychological harm
Participants did not give informed consent as the true purpose of the study was not disclosed to them
This also ties in with the ethical principle of deception
Participants who did not want to continue the study were told to continue - this is in violation of withdrawal rights
Participants were also experiencing highly stressful and traumatic symptoms which goes against the principle of ensuring there is no psychological harm
Syllabus Points
Social influences
Conformity
Conformity
A type of social influence defined as a change in belief or behavior in response to real or imagined social pressure
Factors affecting conformity
Normative influence
Informational influence
Culture
Group size
Unanimity
Deindividuation
Social loafing
Normative influence occurs when individuals conform out of a desire to be accepted, and to not stand out
Individuals do not necessarily share the same beliefs, but will act in a potentially opposing manner in order to fit in
Informational influence is when people conform because they would like to be correct
Individuals will act in a way that allows them to gain desired knowledge held by a particular group
Being a part of either an individualist or collectivist social structure can influence whether individuals are more or less likely to conform to group norms
People of individualistic cultures are less likely to conform to group norms as compared to those from collectivist cultures
The rate of conformity is said to increase as the group size increases
Research has found that groups of 3-5 members have the highest levels of conformity
Any group size over 5 people is said to have limited impact to the degree of conformity
When all members of the group are unanimous, it is most likely that an individual will conform
Deindividuation
The process where people have reduced self-awareness and feel less inhibited in group situations
An individual feels less self-awareness as they shift toward acting as a part of a group rather than as an individual
Individuals feel more anonymous and less self-conscious, and do not consider the consequences and feel less responsibility for their behaviour